民事速裁程序的法理反思与规则重构

Jurisprudential rethinking and rule reconstruction of civil expedited procedures

民事速裁程序定位模糊,其适用范围限定于金钱给付类案件,其功能与督促程序的功能混同。督促程序的无庭审性质有助于反思民事速裁程序的本质属性。从比较法的视角考察域外民事无庭审程序的规定,根据我国的具体国情,建议把民事速裁程序定位为省略开庭审理的特殊简易程序,根据无庭审程序原理构建速裁程序规则,协调与其他程序和制度的关系,给予当事人最低限度的程序保障,进一步推动案件繁简分流。

The ambiguous positioning of the civil expedited procedures and the limitation of its scope of application to monetary payment cases may result in a functional conflation with the supervisory procedure.The non-trial nature of the supervisory procedure helps to reflect on the defining feature of the civil expedited procedures.From the perspective of comparative law to examine the provisionsof extra-territorial civil non-trial procedures,and combined with China's specific national conditions,it is recommended that the basic atributes and functional positioning of civil expedited procedures for the omission of court hearings special summary procedures.The rules of civil expedited procedures should be constructed in accordance with the principle of trial-free procedures,coordinating the relationship with other procedures and systems,granting the parties a lower level of procedural safeguards,and truly realizing the division of complexity and simplicity in litigation cases.