期刊文献+

落锚贯入深度有限元模拟及与经验公式对比

Numerical Simulation of Dropping Anchor Penetration Depth and Comparison with Empirical Fomula
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了在工程实际中更高效地制定兼具安全性与经济性的海底管道铺设方案,对落锚贯入深度进行研究。应用Abaqus建立多组底质及落锚条件下的有限元模型,基于耦合欧拉-拉格朗日(Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian,CEL)法进行落锚贯入的动力响应数值模拟,将有限元结果与现有试验数据及经验公式进行对比分析。有限元结果与试验数据整体吻合性良好,具有较强的参考性。与美国土木工程师协会(ASCE)及挪威船级社(DNV)规范中不同公式进行比较发现:在沙土摩擦角大、黏土不排水剪切强度大的条件下,有限元与公式结果吻合度更大;随落锚重量增大,公式结果较有限元结果保守度增加。 In order to determinate a safe and economical subsea pipe laying plan efficiently in engineering practice,the penetration depth of dropping anchor is studied.The finite element models with multiple sets of bottom materials and anchors are built by Abaqus.Based on the Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian(CEL)method,the dynamic response numerical simulation of anchor dropping penetration is carried out,and the simulation results are compared with the existing data of test and empirical formula.The finite element results are consistent with the test data as a whole and therefore are of certain referential value.Compared with the formulas in ASCE and DNV codes,it is found that:under the condition of sand with larger friction angle and clay with larger undrained shear strength,the results of finite element and formula approach each other;as the anchor weight increases,the formula results are more conservative compared with the finite element results.
作者 张梦玥 梁鹏 肖辉 杨小乐 吴景健 ZHANG Mengyue;LIANG Peng;XIAO Hui;YANG Xiaole;WU Jingjian(Bohai Oilfield Research Institute,Tianjin Branch,CNOOC(China)Limited,Tianjin 300452,China)
出处 《中国海洋平台》 2024年第5期55-59,77,共6页 China offshore Platform
关键词 落锚 海底管道 贯入深度 数值模拟 dropping anchor submarine pipeline penetration depth numerical simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献53

  • 1苗剑.海底管缆裸露治理技术方法及费用分析[J].冶金管理,2019,0(23):44-45. 被引量:1
  • 2郭振邦,张群站,徐慧.海底管道关于锚泊作业的定量风险评估[J].天津理工大学学报,2007,23(5):85-88. 被引量:12
  • 3周健南,王斌,金丰年,袁小军.侵彻岩石深度计算公式对比分析[J].弹箭与制导学报,2007,27(5):119-121. 被引量:9
  • 4江锦,马洪新,秦立成.几种典型海底管道修复技术[G]∥第十五厢中国海洋(岸)工程学术讨论会论文集(上).太原:[出版者不详],2011:405-410.
  • 5DNV. DNV - RP - FI07. Risk assessment of pipeline pro- tection [S] . 2010.
  • 6Andrew P, Neilson A, Sivadasan S. Impact resistance of pipelines and the loss-of-containment limit state [J] . Pipeline Integrity, 2003, 2 (4): 231-240.
  • 7Bai Y, Pederson P T. Elastic-plastic behavior of of]hore steel structures under impact loads [ J ] . International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1993, 13 ( 1 ) : 99 - 115.
  • 8Ellinas C P, Walker A C. Damage on offshore, tubular bracing members [ C ] . Proceedings 1ABSE Colloqui- um on Ship Collusion with Bridge and Offslmre Struc- tures, 1983: 253-261.
  • 9Fumes O, Amdahl J. Ship collisions with offshore plat- forms [C} . Intermaritec 80, September 1980, Ham- burg, West Germany, 1980.
  • 10Noh W F. CEL: A time-dependent, two-space-dimen- sional, coupled eulerian-lagrangian code [ J] . Meth- ods in Computational Physics, 1964 (3) : 117 - 179.

共引文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部