论中国独立调解体育纠纷的法治化进路——基于十国体育纠纷调解机制的对比分析

On the Legal Path of Independent Mediation of Sports Disputes in China——Comparative Analysis of Mediation Mechanisms for Sports Disputes in Ten Countries

我国职业体育引发的体育纠纷迫切需要健全多元化体育纠纷调解机制进行解决。调解在我国具有深厚的历史渊源,被誉为宝贵的“东方经验”,而体育纠纷调解作为全新的法律服务模式,有助于推动体育纠纷多元地、快速地和有效地解决,但是我国现行体育纠纷调解机制存在主体独立性不足、制度与规范欠缺等问题。运用文献研究法、比较分析法、逻辑分析法等方法分析域外体育调解机制,主要从组织形式、机构性质、可调解纠纷范围等角度进行分析,结果发现,域外体育纠纷调解机制具有主体专门化与独立、程序规范化、范围限定与扩展等特征。基于此提出建议:1)在我国现有体育仲裁机构中增设体育纠纷调解机构;2)以《中华人民共和国人民调解法》作为我国体育调解制度内容的基本依据;3)以当事人自愿原则为基础界定体育纠纷范围;4)配备专业体育纠纷调解员。

The rapid development of sports marketization and professionalization in China has led to a multitude of sports disputes,which urgently require the establishment of a diversified sports dispute resolution mechanism to solve the problem.Mediation has a profound historical origin in China and is hailed as a valuable‘Eastern experience’.As a new legal service model,sports dispute mediation helps to promote diversified,rapid,and effective resolution of sports disputes.However,there are problems with insufficient subjectivity and lack of institutional standardization in the current sports mediation mechanisms in our country.By using methods such as literature research,comparative analysis,and logical analysis to analyze the mediation mechanisms of sports outside the domain and analyze from the perspectives of organizational form,institutional nature,and adjustable dispute scope,etc it is mainly found that the foreign sports mediation mechanism has the characteristics of specialized and independent subjects,standardized procedures,and diverse scope.Based on this,suggestions are proposed:1)Add sports dispute mediation institutions to existing sports arbitration institutions in China;2)Using the People’sMediation Law as the basic basis for the content of China’ssports mediationsystem;3)Defining the scopeofsports dispute based on the principleofvoluntary participation of the parties involved;4)Equip a team of professionalsportsdisputemediators.