工具·主体·影响:我国竞赛表演产业政策的三重维度研究

Research on China's Competition Performance Industry Policy under the Threefold Dimension of Instrument-Subject-Influence

竞赛表演业既是体育产业纵深发展的动力引擎,也是满足人民精神需求的重要着力点。在我国,政策引领是扶持竞赛表演业发展的重要措施。使用内容分析法、文献资料法对现行竞赛表演业政策条目从政策工具、政策主体、政策影响力三个维度进行深度解读。政策工具维度:环境型政策工具使用频率最高,供给型政策工具使用频率次之,需求型政策工具使用频率最低;政策效用主体维度:政府是涉及最多的主体层次,企业次之,社会组织再次之,个人最低;政策影响力维度:121号文件是继46号文件之后对于竞赛表演业影响力最强的政策文件,所有政策工具中,环境型政策工具影响力最强,供给型政策工具次之,需求型政策工具最后。经过分析得出,我国竞赛表演业政策存在着政策体系不均衡、主体协同效率不高、政策影响力较弱的不足,需从构建科学均衡的竞赛表演政策体系、促进多元主体协同参与、多维度增加政策影响力三个方面进行后续政策的制定与优化。

The competition performance industry is not only the driving force for the deep development of the sports industry,but also an important point to meeting the spiritual needs of the people.In our country,policy guidance is an important measure to support the development of competition performance industry.Content analysis method and literature data method are used to deeply interpret the current policy items of competition performance industry from three dimensions:policy tools,policy subjects and policy influence.In terms of policy tools,the use frequency of environmental policy tools is the highest,followed by supply policy tools,and demand policy tools are the lowest.The subject dimension of policy effectiveness:government is the most involved subject level,followed by enterprises,social organizations and individuals.Policy influence dimension:Document 121 is the most influential policy document for the competition performance industry after document 46.Among all policy tools,environmental policy tools are the most influential,supply policy tools are the second,and demand policy tools are the last.After analysis,it is concluded that the policy of competition performance industry in China has the deficiencies of unbalanced policy system,low collaborative efficiency of main body and weak policy influence.The follow-up policy formulation and optimization should be carried out from three aspects:building a scientific and balanced policy system of competition performance,promoting the collaborative participation of multiple main bodies,and increasing the policy influence in various dimensions.