期刊文献+

养育动机对跨期决策的影响:一个有调节的中介模型

The Influence of Parenting Motivation on Intertemporal Choice:A Moderated Mediation Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考察养育动机对跨期决策的影响及其内在机制。方法:采用养育动机量表、跨期决策任务和时间焦点量表,对913名父母和非父母被试进行测量。结果:(1)养育动机越强,在跨期决策中更加偏好延迟收益;(2)时间焦点在养育动机和跨期决策间起部分中介作用;(3)性别调节养育动机→时间焦点→跨期决策的前半段路径。相比女生,养育动机对男生的时间焦点有更明显的预测作用。结论:养育动机会增加个体的未来时间焦点关注度,进而偏向延迟收益,在男性群体中该作用表现得更为明显。 Objective:To investigate the effect and internal mechanism of parenting motivation on intertemporal choice.Methods:A sample of 913 parents and non-parent subjects were surveyed by parental care and tenderness scale,intertemporal choice task scale and temporal focus scale.Results:(1)The higher parenting motivation,the more inclined to delayed benefits in intertemporal choice;(2)Parenting motivation indirectly influenced intertemporal choice through temporal focus;(3)The indirect effect of temporal focus was moderated by gender.Specifically,gender moderated the relationship between parenting motivation and temporal focus.Compared with female,parenting motivation had a more significantly predictive effect on the temporal focus of male.Conclusion:Parenting motivation will increase the individual's future time focus,and then bias the delayed benefits,but this path will be different because of gender differences,and the effect will be more obvious in male groups.
作者 廖文莉 钟霜 陈谢平 LIAO Wen-li;ZHONG Shuang;CHEN Xie-ping(Institute of Education Science,Leshan Normal University,Leshan 614000,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2024年第5期1067-1070,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 四川乡村教育发展研究中心项目《乡村中小学生物质贫困对心理贫困的影响及对策研究--以凉山州会理县扶贫地区为例》(项目编号:SCXCJY2023D17) 教育部人文社科规划基金项目《自我决定理论视角下父母养育动机对青少年抑郁的影响研究》(项目编号:23XJA880009)。
关键词 养育动机 跨期决策 时间焦点 性别 Parenting motivation Intertemporal choice Temporal focus Gender
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献104

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3697
  • 2Arieli, A., Ben-Ami, Y., & Rubinstein, A. (2011). Tracking decision makers under uncertainty. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(4), 68-76.
  • 3Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (i986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • 4Bickel, W. K., Pitcock, J. A., Yi, R., & Angtuaco, E. J. C. (2009). Congruence of bold response across intertemporal choice conditions: Fictive and real money gains and losses. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(27), 8839-8846.
  • 5Brehm, J. W. (1556). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. The Journalof Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 384-389.
  • 6Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2008). Conflicting motives in evaluations of sequences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37(2-3), 221-235.
  • 7Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. F., & O'Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351-401.
  • 8G16ckner, A., & Herbold, A. K. (2011). An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(1), 71-98.
  • 9Hardisty, DfJ., Appelt, K. C., & Weber, El U. (2"013). Good or bad, we want it now: Fixed-cost present bias for gains and losses explains magnitude asymmetries in intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(4), 348-361.
  • 10Horstmann, N., Ahlgrimm, A., & G16ckner, A. (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(5), 335-354.

共引文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部