论控制性详细规划的可诉性

AN EXPLORATION ON THE JUSTICIABILITY OF REGULATORY DETAILED PLANNING

控制性详细规划的可诉性争论主要围绕其性质是具体行政行为还是抽象行政行为、是否具备成熟性以及司法机关是否适宜介入控制性详细规划等问题展开。控制性详细规划对象的不特定性及其法律效果的间接性决定了其抽象行政行为属性,同时由于其程序上的完结性与权利救济的必要性而具备成熟性。司法机关对于控制性详细规划的合法性审查不存在功能适当问题,但司法的消极立场事实上阻碍了规划法治的进程。

The debates on the justiciability of regulatory detailed planning primarily focus on whether it is a specific act or an abstract administrative act,its maturity,and its appropriateness for judicial review.The non-specific nature of the regulatory detailed planning and the indirect nature of its legal effect determine it as an abstract administrative act.Meanwhile,it is mature due to its procedural completion and the necessity of rights relief.There is no issue of functional appropriateness for the judicial authority to review the legality of the regulatory detailed planning.However,the negative stance of the judiciary has hindered the advancement of the legislation of planning.