此“谦抑”非彼“谦抑”——对司法谦抑原则在行政诉讼中适用评析

This“Modesty”is not the Other“Modesty”——On Applying the Principle of Judicial Modesty in Administrative Litigation

“谦抑”一词在我国当下法学话语体系中的运用,从某种程度上来说,似乎成为借以探讨法学不同领域问题的一种“常态”。从最初刑法领域对域外谦抑理论的借鉴,又逐渐延展到立法、司法领域适用所进行讨论。既然“谦抑”能够在法学不同领域有如此大的“涵射力”,那么至少表明,不同领域对其适用,不仅符合谦抑语词的字面含义,还同样需要契合彼此领域相互适用的功能构造与价值目标。对谦抑理论在刑法与行政诉讼领域借鉴适用比较分析,表达彼此领域对于“谦抑”借鉴适用本身所应该秉持的谨慎态度,保持法学话语体系的相对统一与稳定。

For the present,the word“modesty”is frequently used to explore the problems in diff erent fi elds of legal science in the legal discourse system in our country,which seems to be a“normal”.It initially refers to the theory of extraterritorial modesty in the fi eld of criminal law,and gets gradually extended to the application of legislation and judicial fi eld.Since“modesty”can have such a large“implication”in diff erent fi elds of jurisprudence,it shows at least that its application in diff erent fi elds not only conforms to the literal meaning of the word Qian Yi,but also needs to fi t the functional structure and value objectives of the fi elds.This paper compares and analyzes the application of modesty theory in the fi eld of criminal law and administrative litigation,and expresses the cautious attitude that all fi elds should be uphold for the reference and application of“modesty”,so as to maintain the relative unity and stability of the legal discourse system.