国内外文化生态系统服务研究

Cultural Ecosystem Services in China and Abroad

为揭示国内外文化生态系统服务(CES)研究的共性和差异,综合运用CiteSpace、VOSviewer等软件对国内外文化生态系统服务开展研究。结果表明:国内外CES研究在价值评估、城市绿地、供需平衡和社交媒体等主要热点领域具有一致性,但国内外CES研究阶段进展、总体特征有所不同;在研究时间方面,国外相关研究起步早且研究前沿成果丰富,国内相关研究起步较晚;在研究内容方面,国外针对多视角、多层次、多区域研究较为丰富,研究内容更加全面和具体,国内还有许多CES类别、方法、尺度、驱动因素等未得到研究;研究理论和应用方面,国外理论探索和应用研究并重,国内目前则还以实证和应用研究为主,缺乏对理论机制和概念框架探讨。据此提出国内应更加注重加强理论基础研究、扩展权衡与协同关系研究和强化群体感知偏好研究等建议。

The CiteSpace,VOSviewer,and other software were used to reveal the commonalities and differences between cultural ecosystem services(CES)in China and abroad.The results show that domestic and international CES research is consistent in the central hot regions,such as value assessment,urban green space,supply and demand balance,and social media.However,the stage progress and overall characteristics of CES research in China and abroad are different.Regarding research time,foreign studies started early and had rich research frontiers,while domestic studies began later.In terms of research content,foreign research on multi-perspective,multi-level,multi-region is more prosperous,and the research content is more comprehensive and specific,while there are still many CES categories,methods,scales,drivers,etc.that have not been studied in China.In terms of research theory and application,foreign theoretical explorations and applied research are emphasized,while domestic empirical and applied research is still dominated by the lack of exploration of theoretical mechanisms and conceptual frameworks.It is proposed that domestic research should focus more on strengthening theoretical knowledge base research,expanding trade-off and synergistic relationship research,and strengthening group perceived preference research in the future.