期刊文献+

实践论视域下的生成式语义学——从认知二维语义学谈起

Generative Semantics from The Perspective of Practical Theory:Starting with EpistemicTwo-dimensional Semantics
原文传递
导出
摘要 认知二维语义学试图在整合名称的描述论和直接指称论的同时,重建意义、理性与模态的“金三角”。但与描述论与直接指称论一样,认知二维语义学忽视了主体行动,因而不能够达成其目标。运用实践论视域下的生成世界观分析表明,要走出二维语义学的僵局,需要语义学研究范式的根本性转换,即由主体行动缺位的传统语义学范式转换为实践论视域下的生成式语义学范式。以作为实践论分析性重塑与拓展的逻辑行动主义方法论为指针,可以揭示生成式语义学的基本机理及其解题功能。 Epistemic two-dimensional semantics attempts to reconstruct the“golden triangle”of meaning,reason,and modality,while integrating descriptive theory of name and direct referential theory.However,like descriptive theory and direct reference theory,epistemic two-dimensional semantics ignores subject action,therefore it cannot achieve its goals.The application of the generative worldview based on practical theory can analyze and demonstrate that a fundamental shift in the paradigm of semantic research is needed to break out of the deadlock of two-dimensional semantics,which is transitioning from the traditional semantic paradigm of the absence of subject action to the generative semantic paradigm in the perspective of practical theory.Guided by the methodology of logical actionsim as a practical analytical reshaping and expansion,we can reveal the basic mechanism and problem-solving function of the generative semantics.
作者 陈吉胜 CHEN Jisheng(School of Marxism Studies,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第5期33-41,共9页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部优秀中青年思政课教师择优资助项目(22JDSZK141) 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(22YJC72040002)。
关键词 认知二维语义学 实践论 行动 生成式语义学 逻辑行动主义方法论 epistemic two-dimensional semantics practical theory action generative semantics methodology of logical actionsim
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献96

  • 1《马克思恩格斯全集》第2版,第3卷,北京:人民出版社,2002年版,第297页.
  • 2Salmon, N. (1982). Reference and Essence (Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell, 1982; second edition, Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books, 2005).
  • 3Kripke, S. (1971). Identity and Necessity, abbreviated as IN in present paper, in M. K. Munitz (ed.), Identity and In- dividuation(New York, NY: New York University Press, 1971 ), pp.135-64.
  • 4Kripke, S (1980). Naming and Necessity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; paperback edition, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 1981 ).
  • 5Soames, S. (2002). Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Seman- tic Agenda of Naming and Necessity ( New York, NY: Oxford U- niversity Press, 2002).
  • 6Fitch, G. W. (2004). Saul Kripke (Durham, UK: Acumen Pub-lishing Limited, 2004).
  • 7Haack, S. (2009). The Growth of Meaning and the Limits of Formalism: Pragmatist Perspectives on Science and Law, Analis Filos6fico, Vol. 29, No.l, 5-29.
  • 8Dummett, M. (1981 ). The Interpretation ofFrege's Philoso- phy (London, UK: Duckworth, 1981), Chap.9 and 10, 182-195, and Appendices, 557-603.
  • 9Hintikka, J. and Sandu, G. (1995). The Fallacies of the New Theory of Reference, Syntheses, vol. 104, 245-283.
  • 10Sosa, D. (2001). Rigidity in the Scope of Rusell's Theo- ry, lVou~, Voi.35, No.l, 1-38.

共引文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部