期刊文献+

我国化学学习进阶研究的回顾与展望——基于化学认识方式及学科能力理论视角

Review and Prospects of Chemistry Learning Progression Research in China-Based on the Perspective of Chemical Cognition Model and Subject Competency Framework
原文传递
导出
摘要 学习进阶是21世纪以来受到国内外教育研究者和实践者广泛关注的研究热点。本文梳理并总结了近20年来我国化学学科学习进阶研究的代表性理论框架——化学认识方式及学科能力模型,对基于该理论框架所开展的关于学科核心概念、跨学科概念、科学实践、学科核心素养4个维度的学习进阶研究成果进行了综述。本研究还进一步讨论了学习进阶研究的关键问题和后续研究重点。 Since the 2lst century,"Learning Progressions"has been a significant focus of attention for both domestic and international educational researchers and practitioners.This paper reviews and summarizes the representative theoretical frameworks of learning progressions in chemistry research over the past 20 years,specifically focusing on the Chemical Cognitive Model and Subject Competency Framework.On this basis,it uses the research conducted by the chemistry education research team at Beijing Normal University as an example to present the theoretical framework and learning progression research results through core disciplinary concepts,interdisciplinary concepts,scientific practices,and core subject competencies.The paper also discusses key issues in learning progression research and highlights future research priorities.
作者 王全 邹紫微 王磊 WANG Quan;ZOU Ziwei;&WANG Lei(College of Chemistry,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875,China;The National Research Institute for Chemistry Teaching Materials,Beijing,100875,China;Chongqing NO.8 Secondary School,Chongqing,401120,China;Faculty of Arts and Sciences,Beijing Normal University,Zhuhai,519085,China)
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第10期44-63,共20页 Global Education
基金 国家教材建设重点研究基地2023年度教育部规划重点项目“化学课程标准和教科书使用的跟踪研究”(项目编号:2023GH-ZDI-JJ-Y-06)的阶段性成果。
关键词 学习进阶 化学 化学认识方式 学科能力 learning progressions chemistry Chemical Cognition Model subject competencies
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献72

  • 1林崇德.论学科能力的建构[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1997(1):5-12. 被引量:149
  • 2Smith C, Wiser M,et al. Implications of Research onChildren.s Learning for Assessment: Matter and Atom-ic Molecular Theory[R]. Commissioned paper preparedfor the National Research Council’s Committee on TestDesign for K-12 Science Achievement, 2004.
  • 3Salinas I. Learning Progressions in Science Education:Two Approaches for Development [C]. The LearningProgressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference. Iowa City,IA, 2009.
  • 4GotwalsA, Alonzo A. Leaping into Learning Progres-sions in Science [A]. Alonzo A, Gotwais A (Eds).Learning Progressions in Science[M]. Rotterdam: Sen-se Publishers, 2012 :4-12.
  • 5Roseman J, Caldwell A, et al. Mapping a CoherentLearning Progression for the Molecular Basis of Heredi-ty[EB/OL].检索于2013年10月8日,来源网址:http : // www. proj ect2061. org/ pubUcations/articales/papers/narst2006. pdf.
  • 6Alonzo A,Gotwais A (Eds. ). Learning Progressionsin Science[M]. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2012.
  • 7National Research Council. Taking Science to School[M].Washington. D. C. : National Academies Press. 2007.
  • 8DuschlR,MaengS &.SezenA. Learning Progressions andTeaching Sequences: A Review and Analysis[J]. Stud-ies in Science Education, 2011,47 (2) : 123-182.
  • 9Stevens S, ShinN. Krajcik J. Towards a Model forthe Development of an Empirically Tested Learning Pro-gression[C]. In Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS).
  • 10Driver R, Leach J,et al. Young People’s Understand-ing of Science Concepts : Implications of Cross-ageStudies for Curriculum Planning[J]. Studies in ScienceEducation, 1994(24) : 75-100.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部