期刊文献+

我国地理学习进阶研究的回顾与展望

The Review and Prospect of Geography Learning Progression Research in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 学习进阶以促进核心概念的理解与核心素养的提升为站位,明晰学生的发展空间,能够为课程科学设计、教师有效教学、学生自我监控等提供参考标尺。本文分析了104篇我国地理学习进阶研究文献,发现:(1)近年来研究热度总体攀升,研究学段分布广泛,跨学段研究受到重视;(2)基本形成“构建进阶框架—开发测评工具—探知进阶现状—实施教学方案”的通用研究路径;(3)研究主题可分为“核心概念”“核心素养”“其他”“学习进阶的教学实践”四类,进阶框架与教学实践的有效联结方式仍有待深入探索。基于此,本文提出值得各类研究共同探讨的话题,并对研究的未来发展作出展望。 Learning progressions can clarify students'developmental pathways with the standpoint of promoting an understanding of core concepts and cultivating core competencies.This provides valuable benchmarks for curriculum design,effective teaching,and student self-monitoring.This research analyzes 104 papers on geography learning progressions in China,with the following key findings:(1)Research interest has been rising in recent years,covering a broad range of educational stages,with a notable focus on cross-stage research;(2)A common research trajectory has emerged,involving the construction of progression frameworks,development of assessment tools,investigation of progression status,and implementation of teaching plans;(3)Research topics are categorized into four types,namely,"core concepts","core competencies","other",and"teaching practice of learning progressions".However,the effective integration between progression frameworks and teaching practices requires further exploration.Based on these insights,this paper suggests key areas for future research,and provides an outlook on the direction of future studies.
作者 谷同耀 王民 GU Tongyao;WANG Min(Faculty of Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875,China;Faculty of Geographical Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875,China)
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第10期78-91,共14页 Global Education
关键词 地理教育 学习进阶 核心概念 核心素养 教学实践 geography education learning progressions core concepts core competencies teachingpractice
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献120

  • 1叶丽新.学业质量标准:从充分理解到运用与发展[J].教育发展研究,2020(10):44-49. 被引量:23
  • 2林崇德.论学科能力的建构[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1997(1):5-12. 被引量:149
  • 3王磊,刘强,张小平,鲁礼林,阿依努尔.试析《普通高中化学课程标准(实验)》中的实验体系[J].化学教育,2004,25(9):9-12. 被引量:16
  • 4国际地理联合会地理教育委员会.地理教育国际宪章.地理学报,1993,(7):290-290.
  • 5温.哈伦.科学教育的原则和大概念[M].韦钰,译.北京:科学普及出版社,2011: 23—26.
  • 6Lisa Fratt. Less Is More: Trimming the OverstuffedCurriculum [J]. District Administrator, 2002,38(3): 56—60.
  • 7Bill &. Melinda Gates Foundation. Fewer, Clearer,Higher: Moving Forward with Consistent, RigorousStandards for All Students [EB/OL]. http: //www. gatesfoundation. org/highschools/Documents/fewer-clearer-higher-standards. pdf. 2012-10-20.
  • 8Achieve. International Science Benchmarking ReportTaking the Lead in Science Education: Forging Next-Generation Science Standards Executive Summary [EB/OL]. http: //www. achieve, org, 2013-04-10.
  • 9Achieve. The Need for New Science Standards [EB/OL ]. http: //www. nextgenscience. org/overview-0. 2013-6-28.
  • 10Helen Quinn, Tom Keller,Brett Moulding. NSTAWeb Seminars: A Framework for K-12 Science Educa-tion: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts and Core Ideas[EB/OL]. http: //leamingcenter. nsta. org/product 一detail, aspx. id-10. 2505/9781936959778. 2011-12-10.

共引文献533

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部