期刊文献+

代理VS.批发:信息共享对电子书销售模式的影响

Agency VS.Wholesale:The Effect of Information Sharing on the E-Book Sales Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 在出版商和零售平台之间需求信息不对称的背景下,通过构建Stackelberg博弈模型,探究了零售平台的需求信息共享决策对电子书销售模式策略的影响.研究结果表明:1)批发模式下,零售平台不与出版商共享需求信息,但在代理模式下,若零售平台从电子书渠道获得的佣金比例较高时,零售平台会与出版商共享需求信息.2)就零售平台而言,若零售平台不与出版商共享需求信息,则零售平台偏好批发模式.若仅代理模式下零售平台与出版商共享需求信息,当零售平台对市场需求预测的精准度较低时,零售平台偏好代理模式;否则,偏好批发模式.3)就出版商而言,零售平台的需求信息共享决策、电子书对纸质书的替代率以及零售平台对需求信息预测的精准度均会影响出版商对销售模式的选择. Under the background of asymmetric demand information in a publisher and a retail platform,this paper establishes the Stackelberg game model to explore the impact of the retail platform's demand information sharing decision on the e-book sales model strategy.The main results show that:1)The retail platform does not always share demand information with the publisher under the wholesale model.Under the agency model,if the commission rate from selling e-books is high,the retail platform will share demand information;Otherwise,the retail platform will not share demand information.2)For the retail platform,in cases where the retail platform doesn't share demand information in both agency and wholesale models,the retail platform prefers the wholesale model.In cases where the retail platform shares demand information only in the agency model,if the accuracy of demand information is low,the retail platform prefers the agency model.3)For the publisher,the retail platform's decision to share demand information,the substitution rate of e-books for paper books,and the accuracy of demand information will all affect the publisher's choice of sales model.
作者 刘正 石纯来 杜荣 LIU Zheng;SHI Chunlai;DU Rong(School of Economics and Management,Xidian University,Xi'an 710126)
出处 《系统科学与数学》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第10期3025-3039,共15页 Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(72171187,72201202) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(22YJC630116) 陕西省社会科学基金项目(2022R007) 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2022JQ-744) 中央基本科研业务费资助项目(KYFZ23017)资助课题。
关键词 需求信息共享 电子书 销售模式 代理模式 批发模式 Demand information sharing e-books sales model agency model wholesale model.
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献70

  • 1侯炳辉,吕文超.我国信息系统发展道路与模式的探讨[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),1993,33(3):107-112. 被引量:1
  • 2孙华梅,李一军,黄梯云.管理信息系统的发展与展望[J].运筹与管理,2004,13(6):1-5. 被引量:13
  • 3申悦,于瑞峰,吴甦,刘丽文.零售商B ertrand竞争下的供应链成本信息共享价值[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(11):1581-1584. 被引量:47
  • 4周永务,杨善林.基于不对称需求信息的供应链协调定价[J].系统工程学报,2006,21(6):591-597. 被引量:27
  • 5Kumar N, Ruan R. On manufacturers complementing the traditional retail channel with a direct online channel [ J ]. Quantitative Marketing and Economies, 2006, 4( 3 ) : 289 - 323.
  • 6Yao DQ, Liu J. Competitive pricing of mixed retail and e-tail distribution channels [J]. Omega, 2005, 33(3): 235 -47.
  • 7Alptekinoglu A, Tang CS. A model for analyzing multi-channeldistribution systems [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 163 (3) : 802 - 824.
  • 8Yao D, Yue X, Mukhopadhyay SK, Wang Z. Strategic inventory deployment for retail and e-tail stores [ J ]. Omega, 2009, 37 (3) : 646 -658.
  • 9Chiang W, Chhajed D, Hess JD. Direct marketing, indirect profits: a strategic analysis of dual channel supply chain design [ J]. Management Science, 2003, 49 ( 1 ) : 1 - 20.
  • 10Park SY, Keh HT. Modeling hybrid distribution channels: a game-theoretic analysis [ J ]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2003, 10(3): 155 -167.

共引文献273

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部