公共文化服务体系运转的理论框架、制度逻辑和健全路径

Theoretical Framework,Institutional Logic,andd ImprovementPathwayssof China's Public Cultural Service System

健全和完善现代公共文化服务体系是建设社会主义文化强国的关键议题,也是进一步全面深化改革、推进中国式现代化的重要任务之一。但公共文化服务领域专门理论贫瘠,导致学界和业界很难对“如何健全”“如何完善”的新时代之问做出富有深度的回答。本文受“多重制度逻辑”理论的启发、立足长期的调研工作,通过系统梳理、整合现有研究成果,构建了解释公共文化服务体系如何运转的“实践—制度”分析框架。作为一套整合性的专门理论,“实践—制度”框架由五个命题组成,把制度逻辑及其内部张力确立为公共文化理论研究的中心课题,并为该课题的求解提供了线索和思路。文章利用“实践—制度”框架,为现代公共文化服务体系的高速发展提供了一种解释,认为“项目逻辑”与“常规逻辑”、“行政逻辑”与“专业逻辑”、“供给逻辑”与“需求逻辑”三组制度逻辑关系是推动现代公共文化服务体系高速发展的原因,也塑造了难以消解的系统性难点和痛点。文章提出构建政府主导的协同治理模式、打造嵌入中国社会的制度体系、健全问题导向的创新示范制度、推进更富深度的国际经验研究等建议,初步回应了“如何健全现代公共文化服务体系”的问题。相比解释路径与研究建议,作为理论工具的“实践—制度”框架更值得重视,文章试图通过这一工具的构建,唤醒学界对于公共文化服务领域运作规律的理论讨论。图1。表3。参考文献36。

The development and improvement of the modern public cultural service system is not only a key issue for China in becoming a leading cultural country,but also one of the important tasks for further deepening reform comprehensively to advance Chinese modernizationIn this context,“how to improve” becomes an unavoidable central issue in the research of public cultural service in the new era. However,the scarcity of specialized theory in the field of public cultural service makes it difficult for academia and industry to provide in depth answers to this issue.Inspired by the “multiple institutional logics” theory and based on long term research,this article constructs a practice-institution analytical framework to explain the operation of the public cultural service system through systematic organization and integration of existing research findings. As an integrative theory for specialized research,the practice-institution framework consists of five propositions:Proposition 1 states that the daily practice of public cultural service is dominated by institutional logic. Proposition 2 indicates that multiple institutional logics lead the institutional arrangements in the field of public cultural service. Proposition 3 points out that the institutional arrangements of public cultural service shape the system's daily practice throughout the policy lifecycle. Proposition 4 shows that the institutional logic of the public cultural service system is influenced by both internal and external factors. Proposition 5 reveals that it is various outcomes in daily practice that lead to systemic difficulties and pain points within the public cultural service system. In summary,this framework establishes institutional logic and its internal tensions as the central subject of public cultural theory research,providing clues and approaches for addressing this subject. Utilizing the practice-institution framework,the article explores the reasons behind the rapid development of the modern public cultural service system. It proposes an explanatory path centered on three sets of institutional logic relationships:“project logic” and “routine logic,”“administrative logic” and “professional logic,”“supply logic” and “demand logic,” and further discusses the usability and expandability of this explanatory path.Finally,the article suggests building a government led collaborative governance model,creating an institutional system embedded in Chinese society,developing a problem oriented innovative demonstration system,and advancing more in depth research on international experience to preliminarily address “how to improve the modern public cultural service system.” At the same time,the author notes that compared to the explanatory path and research suggestions,the practice-institution framework as a theoretical tool may deserve more attention. The article attempts to use this tool to stimulate theoretical discussions on the operational laws of the public cultural service field in academia. 1 fig. 3 tabs. 36 refs.