支付结算型“帮信罪”与“掩瞒罪”的区分标准及应用

Distinguishing Standard and Application of Payment and Settlement Conduct in“Crime of Aiding Cybercrime”and“Crime of Disguising or Concealing”

支付结算型“帮信罪”与“掩瞒罪”的客观行为都包含转账、套现、取现因而存在重合,给司法实践带来区分困难。经分析“上游犯罪既遂后无帮信罪”与“上游犯罪既遂后仍可成立帮信罪”两类观点,可析出介入时点和行为性质两个不同区分方向。介入时点不应成为判断标准,行为性质才是界分关键。由实质解释可知,掩瞒罪的法益构造具有二重性,帮信罪则具有兜底性质。在区分之际,应当遵循先判断行为的掩瞒性质,再判断帮信性质,继而根据主客观相统一原则确定最终罪名的“三层次判断标准”。

The objective behaviors of“payment settlement type”crime of aiding information network criminal activities and the crime of concealment both include transfer and cash out,so there is overlap,which brings difficulty to distinguish in the judicial practice.After analyzing the current two categories and four demarcation standards,they represent the different directions of participation time and behavior nature.Participation time should not be the criterion of judgment,the nature of behavior is the key to demarcation.Based on the substantive interpretation of the criminal law,the legal interest structure of the crime of concealment has a dual nature,while crime of aiding information network criminal activities has a revealing nature.We should follow the“three-level judgment standard”:first,judging the crime of concealment,then judging the crime of aiding information network criminal activities,and then determining the final crime according to the principle of the unification of subjective and objective.This“three-level judgment standard”has good theoretical and practical application functions.