1Alexiadou, A. , E. Anagnostopoulou & F. Schafer. 2006. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically [A]. In M. Frascarelli (eds.). Phases of Interpretation [C]. Berlin New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 187-221.
2Croft, W. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection [J]. Language 67(3) :547-619.
4Hale, K. & S. J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5Koontz-Garboden, A. 2009. Anticausativization [J]. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (27) :77-138.
6Levin, B. & H. M. Rappaport. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syantx-Le:rical Semantics Interface [ M ]. Cambridge, MIT Press.
7Levin, B. & H. M. Rappaport. 2005. Argument Realization [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8McKoon, G. & T. Macfarland. 2000. Externally and internally caused change of state verbs [J]. Language 76(4) : 833-58.
9Pinon, C. 2001. Modelling the causative-inchoative alternation [J]. Linguistische Areitsberichte 76: 273- 93.
10Primus, B. 1999. Cases and Thematic Roles: Ergative, Accusative and Active[M]. Niemeyer: Tubingen Press.
