摘要
兜底条款是以一个条文前面列举的各项规定为典型情形,对剩余的次要事项,以含有“其他”的命题式语句,体现为法律文本层次结构“项”的总括规定。基于良法标准对法律中兜底条款进行观察,可以发现诸多不尽如人意之处:“兜”“底”错配,外观标识不清,列举层次过少,主次地位混同。兜底条款是个复杂的法律现象,并不是非此即彼、非黑即白的选择,需要在多元的法律价值目标面前,运用法律智慧,寻找一个合适的平衡点。兜底条款有着特定的规范结构、功能定位,也有着相应的技术规范。兜底条款的设置,应当编入立法技术规范,选择疏密适度的“过滤网”,经过充分细致的立法论证,采取与时俱进的动态调整。
Catch-all provisions typically address the residual,minor matters not covered by the main provisions of a legal text,using propositional statements containing the word“other”to form an overarching clause at the hierarchical“item”level of the legal document.Observing existing catch-all provisions in current laws based on the standard of good legislation reveals several shortcomings:mismatch between scope and depth,unclear external markers,insufficient levels of enumeration,and confusion between primary and secondary status.Catch-all provisions represent a complex legal phenomenon;they are not binary choices but rather require legal wisdom to strike a balance among diverse and even contradictory legal values.They have specific normative structures,functional positions,and corresponding technical specifications.The design of catch-all provisions should be incorporated into legislative technical standards,using an appropriately dense“filter”chosen.At the same time,we should proceed thorough legislative reasoning and adopt dynamic adjustments in line with contemporary developments.
作者
刘风景
LIU Fengjing(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第6期1-13,共13页
Modern Law Science
关键词
兜底条款
例示规定
“其他”
立法技术
catch-all provisions
enumerative provisions
“other”
legislative technique