期刊文献+

Current treatment for male infertility:an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

原文传递
导出
摘要 This umbrella review aimed to summarize and provide a general evaluation of the effectiveness of current treatments for male infertility and assess the quality of evidence and possible biases.An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available in PubMed,Web of Science,and Scopus,covering studies published up to October 2023,was conducted.Sperm concentration,morphology,and motility were used as endpoints to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments.Of 2998 studies,18 published meta-analyses were extracted,yielding 90 summary effects on sperm concentration(n=36),sperm morphology(n=26),and sperm motility(n=28)on 28 interventions.None of the meta-analyses were classified as having low methodological quality,whereas 12(66.7%)and 6(33.3%)had high and moderate quality,respectively.Of the 90 summary effects,none were rated high-evidence quality,whereas 53.3%(n=48),25.6%(n=23),and 21.1%(n=19)were rated moderate,low,and very low,respectively.Significant improvements in sperm concentration,morphology,and motility were observed with pharmacological interventions(N-acetyl-cysteine,antioxidant therapy,aromatase inhibitors,selective estrogen receptor modulators,hormones,supplements,and alpha-lipoic acid)and nonpharmacological interventions(varicocele repair and redo varicocelectomy).In addition,vitamin supplementation had no significant positive effects on sperm concentration,motility,or morphology.Treatments for male infertility are increasingly diverse;however,the current evidence is poor because of the limited number of patients.Further well-designed studies on single treatment and high-quality meta-analysis of intertreatment comparisons are recommended.
出处 《Asian Journal of Andrology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2024年第6期645-652,共8页 亚洲男性学杂志(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(grant No.81500522) the Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province(No.2020YFS0090 and No.2020YFS0046).
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献48

  • 1Steeno O, Knops J, Declerck L, Adimoelja A, van de Veorde H. Prevention of fertility disorders by detection and treatment of varicocele at school and college age. Andrologia 1976; 8: 47-53.
  • 2Greenberg SH, Lipshultz LI, Wein AJ. Experience with 425 subfertile male patients. J Uro11978; 119: 507-10.
  • 3Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioglu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Andro12009; 30: 33-40.
  • 4Cayan S, Kadioglu TC, Tefekli A, Kadioglu A, Tellaloglu S. Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele. Urology 2000; 55: 750-4.
  • 5Watanabe M, Nagai A, Kusumi N, Tsuboi H, Nasu Y, etal. Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches. IntJ Uro12005; 12: 892-8.
  • 6Ghanem H, Anis T, EI-Nashar A, Shamloul R. Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varioocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome. Urology,2004; 64: 1005-9.
  • 7Yavetz H, Levy R, Papo J, Yogev L, Paz G, etal. Efficacy of varicocele embolization versus ligation of the left internal spermatic vein for improvement of sperm quality. Int J Andro11992; 15: 338-44.
  • 8Jungwirth A, Gogns C, Hauser G, Gomahr A, Schmeller N, et al. Clinical outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in infertile men. Andrologia 2001; 33: 71-4.
  • 9Orhan I, Onur R, Semerciaz A, Firdolas F, Ardicoglu A, et al. Comparison of two different microsurgical methods in the treatment of varicocele. Arch Andro12005; 51: 213-20.
  • 10Kumar R, Gupta NP. Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: evaluation of the results. Urol Int 2003; 71: 368-72.

共引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部