期刊文献+

美国调节贫富分化的政策措施与制度缺陷

Policy Measures and Institutional Deficiencies in Regulating Wealth Gap in US
原文传递
导出
摘要 贫富差距过大是美国作为发达国家一直为人诟病的问题。从世界范围来看,美国的贫富差距水平远高于日本、德国、瑞典等多数发达国家;从美国自身来看,美国当前的贫富差距水平与19世纪和20世纪相比处于历史高位。多年来,为遏制贫富差距过大导致的不良后果,美国将调节收入分配、缩小贫富差距作为政府干预经济的重要手段,在初次分配中通过反垄断规制、促进就业及保护劳动者权益等措施维护市场公平;在再分配环节,建立以收入税为主的累进税制,调节收入增量与财富存量,并通过完善社会保障制度力求保障低收入群体的基本生活,提高低收入群体的自我发展能力。美国丰富的公益慈善资源也有效促进了资源由富裕群体向贫困群体的流动和转移。虽然美国调节贫富差距的政策措施在一定程度上遏制了贫富分化速度,但由于美国大多数群体秉持个人主义和自由主义的价值观念,政府对收入分配的干预和调节力度有限。繁琐的税收条款及程序、严苛的公共社会保障政策条件也削弱了其再分配制度的有效性。从根本上看,资本主义的内在矛盾和政策局限导致美国分配制度未能在改善贫富差距、促进社会公平中发挥持续有效的积极作用。 The wide wealth gap in the US,a developed country,has long been criticized.From a global perspective,the wealth gap in the US is much larger than that in most developed countries,such as Japan,Germany,and Sweden.From a national perspective,the current wealth gap in the US is at a historical peak compared with that in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.In order to mitigate the adverse consequences of the wide wealth gap,the US government has been regulating income distribution and narrowing the wealth gap as an important means of government intervention in the economy:in the primary distribution,it ensures market equity through anti-monopoly regulations,employment promotion,protection of the rights and interests of workers,and other measures;in the redistribution,it establishes a progressive tax system based on income taxes to regulate the income increment and the stock of wealth,and through the improvement of the social security system,it strives to safeguard the basic livelihoods of low-income groups and improve their self-development ability.The abundant charity resources in the US also effectively promote the flow and transfer of resources from the rich to the poor.While the policy measures implemented in the US to reduce the wealth gap have,to some extent,mitigated its progression,the predominance of individualistic and liberal values among most groups limits the government's capacity for intervention and regulation in income distribution.Complex tax clauses and procedures,along with the stringent requirements associated with public social security policies,undermine the effectiveness of the redistribution system.Fundamentally,the intrinsic contradictions and policy constraints of capitalism have hindered the US distribution system from playing a sustained and effective role in reducing the wealth gap and promoting social fairness.
作者 王海霞 赵梅 Wang Haixia;Zhao Mei(Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)
出处 《国际经济合作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第6期64-74,90,共12页 Journal of International Economic Cooperation
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目,中国社会科学院博士后研究项目“美国的分配制度与贫富差距治理研究”的阶段性成果。
关键词 贫富分化 收入分配 财税政策 贫困治理 公益慈善 polarization between the rich and the poor income distribution fiscal and tax policies poverty governance public charity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献32

  • 1尹志超,李青蔚,张诚.收入不平等对家庭杠杆率的影响[J].财贸经济,2021(1):77-91. 被引量:23
  • 2王小鲁,樊纲.中国收入差距的走势和影响因素分析[J].经济研究,2005,40(10):24-36. 被引量:691
  • 3Jonathan Gruber, Public Finance and Public Policy (New York: Worth Publishers, 2005), pp. 459-462.
  • 4Social Security Administration, SSI Annual Statistical Report, 2008, September 2009, p. 16.
  • 5Social Security Administration, SSI Annual Statistical Report, 2008, September 2009, p. 21.
  • 6Arthur Jones, Current Population Reports, Supplemental Security Income and Its Noninstitutional Re- cipients: July 1997 and 1999, August 2003, pp. 70-90, available at: http://www. census. gov/prod/ 2003pubs/p70- 90. pdf.
  • 7Kevin A. Hassett, "Is the Payroll Tax a Tax?" NationalReview Online, March 29, 2005, available at: ht- tp://old.ationalreview.com/nrof_hassett/hassett200503290921. asp.
  • 8尼古拉斯·巴尔.《福利国家经济学》(郑秉文、穆怀中等译),北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2003年版,第97-100页.
  • 9Kathleen M. McGarry, "Guaranteed Income SSI and the Well-Being of the Elderly Poor,"in Martin Feld- stein and Jeffrey B. Liebman eds. , The Distributional Aspects of Social Security and Social Security Re- form (Chicago.. University of Chicago Press, 2002), pp. 49-84.
  • 10Social Security Administration, Annual Statistical Supplement to the Social Security Bulletin, 2009, Feb- ruary 19, 2010, p. 5.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部