评教还是评人:普通高校体育课程学生评教有效性研究

Evaluation of teaching or individuals:A study on the effectiveness of student evaluation of teaching in physical education courses of college and university

采用问卷调查、数理统计等方法对普通高校体育课程学生评教有效性进行实证研究。研究发现,学生评教既是对“教”的评价,也是对“人”的评价,评教分数具有区分度和有效性。具体而言:(1)“一表多课”学生评教体系造成体育课程评教分数低于其他课程;(2)教学因素影响评教结果,教得好(教学效果好)的教师评教分数较好;(3)非教学因素“人”影响学生评教分数,青年教师、讲师、人缘好、颜值好、技能好的女性教师更易获学生好评,即体育课程教师存在差异;(4)体育课程教学项目评教也存差异,三大球、三小球优于武术、健美操、瑜伽等项目。研究认为,构建不同课程评教指标、实现评教专业化发展,加强学生评教宣传,助力评教公正公平,用好评教结果,实现以评促教,从而有效提升普通高校体育课程教学质量。

This empirical study uses questionnaire surveys and statistical analysis to investigate the effectiveness of student evaluations in physical education courses at colleges and universities.The findings reveal that student evaluation of teaching assess both the"teaching"and the"individual”,and evaluation scores demonstrate differentiation and effectiveness.Specifically:(1)the"one form for multiple courses"evaluation system leads to lower scores for physical education compared to other courses;(2)teaching factors influence evaluation results,with teachers who perform well receiving higher scores;(3)non-teaching factors,such as the teacher's youth,rapport,attractiveness,and skills,impact evaluation scores,showing differences among physical education instructors;(4)there are discrepancies in evaluation among different physical education projects,with team sports and racket sports outperforming martial arts,aerobics,and yoga.Thus,it is recommended to develop differentiated evaluation indicators for various courses,promote specialized development of evaluations,enhance publicity around student evaluations,ensure fairness and justice in evaluations,utilize evaluation results to improve teaching,and to ultimately enhance the quality of physical education courses in general universities.