摘要
[目的]对比不同体系电镀Zn-Ni合金镀层的性能差异,为实际生产中的工艺选择提供参考。[方法]分别采用碱性锌酸盐−硫酸镍体系、硫酸盐体系和氯化物体系在Q235低碳钢上电镀Zn-Ni合金,对比了所得镀层的外观、厚度、结合力、耐蚀性和表面形貌。[结果]氯化物体系Zn-Ni合金镀层在耐蚀性和结合力方面表现最佳;碱性体系Zn-Ni合金镀层的外观和结合力较好;硫酸盐体系Zn-Ni合金镀层的外观较好,但结合力有待提高。[结论]不同体系电镀Zn-Ni合金镀层各有优缺点,在实际生产中可按需选择合适的镀液。
[Introduction]The performance differences of Zn-Ni alloy coatings electroplated from different baths need to be compared to provide a reference for process selection in actual production.[Method]Zn-Ni alloy coatings were electroplated on Q235 low carbon steel respectively from alkaline zincate-nickel sulfate bath,sulfate-based bath,and chloride-based bath,and their appearance,thickness,adhesion,corrosion resistance,and surface morphologies were compared.[Result]The Zn-Ni alloy coating electroplated from chloride-based bath had the best corrosion resistance and adhesion,the one electroplated from alkaline bath had good appearance and adhesion,while the one electroplated from sulfate-based bath had poorer adhesion than the others in spite of its good appearance.[Conclusion]Zn-Ni alloy coatings electroplated from different baths had their own advantages and disadvantages.Appropriate plating bath should be selected according to the requirements in actual production.
作者
钟佳
陈耀明
廉玉利
刘志昌
王义
王浩坤
赵梦凡
张馥
ZHONG Jia;CHEN Yaoming;LIAN Yuli;LIU Zhichang;WANG Yi;WANG Haokun;ZHAO Mengfan;ZHANG Fu(Department of Biochemical Engineering,Chaoyang Normal University,Chaoyang 122000,China;Assa Abloy Guoqiang(Shandong)Hardware Technology Co.,Ltd.,Leling 253600,China;Wendeng Guangrun Metal Products Co.,Ltd.,Weihai 266440,China;School of Materials Science and Engineering,Shandong Jianzhu University,Ji’nan 250101,China)
出处
《电镀与涂饰》
CAS
北大核心
2024年第11期53-59,共7页
Electroplating & Finishing
关键词
电镀
锌−镍合金
镀液配方
外观
厚度
结合力
耐蚀性
表面形貌
electroplating
zinc-nickel alloy
bath composition
appearance
thickness
adhesion
corrosion resistance
surface morphology