期刊文献+

扩散峰度加权成像评估前列腺癌恶性程度的价值

Evaluation of malignant degree of prostate cancer by diffusion kurtosis weighted imaging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析扩散峰度加权成像评估前列腺癌恶性程度的价值。方法收集110例经手术病理证实为前列腺癌且癌灶直径大于0.5cm的患者资料,患者治疗前行3T-MR及DKI扫描,b值为0、300、700、1400、2100 s/mm^(2),后处理软件进行图像处理,兴趣区选择方法为对照手术病理切片发现肿瘤位置,在DWI图像逐层勾画全肿瘤感兴趣区,其中利用DKI模型进行histogram分析分别扩散系数D_(app)与扩散峰度K_(app)。采用t检验及Spearman相关分析鉴别低侵袭(GS≤6)及中-高侵袭组(GS≥7),组间行受试者工作特征(Receiver Operating Characteristic ROC)分析。结果手术标本共发现体积大于0.5cm癌灶低级别癌灶49枚,高级别癌灶77枚。扩散系数D_(app)与扩散系数K_(app)与前列腺癌Gleason评分具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。K_(app)与GS呈正相关,而D_(app)具有较K_(app)相反的趋势,恶性程度越高D_(app)值越低。ADC与D_(app)趋势一致,两者线性相关。参数间比较基于ROC分析,发现K_(app)较D_(app),ADCs诊断效能高,曲线下面积、敏感性、特异性较其余参数高(K_(app)0.889;74.1%;93.9%vs D_(app)0.765;61.0%;79.6%;P<0.05;vs.ADCs 0.738;71.4%;P<0.05)。结论DKI模型用于前列腺癌GS的鉴别,并可成为可靠的评估前列腺癌恶性程度的无创性检查方式。K_(app)较其它所有参数具有更好的区分前列腺癌恶性程度的临床诊断效能。
作者 王晴 Wang Qing
出处 《常州实用医学》 2018年第6期354-359,共6页 Changzhou Practical Medicinne
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献61

  • 1张小马,梁朝朝.正常前列腺形态组织学及影像学研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(11):787-789. 被引量:8
  • 2史浩,丁红宇.弥散加权成像在前列腺癌诊断与鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J].中华男科学杂志,2007,13(7):605-609. 被引量:13
  • 3杨正汉,冯逢,王霄英.磁共振成像技术指南[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2010:273.
  • 4Beppu T, lnoue T, Shibata Y, et al. Fractional anisotropy value hy diffusion tensor magnetic resoance imaging as a predictor of cell density and proliferation activity of glioblastomas [ J ]. Surg Neurol, 2005, 63(1 ): 56-61.
  • 5Jolapara M, Patro SN, Kesavadas C, et al. Can diffusion tensor metrics help in preoperative grading of diffusely infiltrating astro- eytomas? A retrospective study of 36 cases [ J]. Neuroradiology, 2011, 53(1): 63-68.
  • 6de Carvalho Rangel C, Hygino Cruz LC Jr, Takayassu TC, et al. Diffusion MR imaging in central nervous system [ J]. Magn Reson hnaging Clin N Am, 2011, 19( 1 ) : 23-53.
  • 7Shimofusa R, Fujimoto H, Akamata H, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate caneer [ J] . J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2005, 29(2) : 149-153.
  • 8Li C, Chen M, Li S, et al. Detection of prostate cancer in pe- ripheral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quanti- tative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR1, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T [J]. Acta Radiol, 2014, 55(2) : 239-247.
  • 9lwazawa J, Mitani T, Sassa S, et al. Prostate cancer detection with MRI : is dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging necessary in ad- dition to diffusion-weighted imaging? [ J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2011 , 17(3) : 243-248.
  • 10Oto A, Yang C, Kayhan A, et al. Diffusion-weighted and dynam- ic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quan- titative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis [J]. AJR, 2011, 197(6): 1382-1390.

共引文献135

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部