摘要
生成式人工智能的兴起引发了网络版权领域新的侵权纠纷类型与平台责任关注。在版权直接侵权层面,AIGC服务提供者并不必然构成演绎权侵权,但发生“模型记忆”时受信息网络传播权规制;在版权间接侵权层面,AIGC服务提供者版权替代责任的认定依赖于用户直接侵权的成立。内容呈现模式的封闭性决定了AIGC版权侵权判定的特殊性,但内容输出量级的放大效应客观增加了社会整体的版权侵权风险。为此,需要聚焦AIGC服务提供者注意义务的具体情形,设定科学的事前、事中与事后版权保护措施体系。
The rise of generative artificial intelligence has triggered new types of copyright infringement disputes and con-cerns about platform liability in the field of online copyright.In terms of direct copyright infringement,AIGC service providers do not necessarily constitute an infringement of derivative right,however,when“model memory”occurs,it is regulated by the right to network information dissemination.In terms of indirect copyright infringement,the determination of copyright vicarious liabil-ity for AIGC service providers depends on the establishment of direct infringement by the user.The closed nature of content pre-sentation patterns determines the particularity of copyright infringement determination in AIGC,but the amplification effect of content output volume objectively increases the overall risk of copyright infringement in society.Therefore,it is necessary to fo-cus on the specific circumstances of the duty of care for AIGC service providers and establish a scientific system of copyright pro-tection measures in advance,during,and after the provision of services.
出处
《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第6期39-49,共11页
Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
AIGC
版权
信息网络传播权
演绎权
直接侵权
间接侵权
注意义务
AIGC
copyright
right to network information dissemination
derivative right
direct infringement
indirect infringement
duty of care