兜底罪名竞合解释的科学性构建

Scientific Construction of Competing Explanations for Bottom Line Charges

兜底罪名竞合问题,研究的是同一不法行为构成兜底罪名还是构成非兜底罪名的选择问题。兜底罪名的法益涉及公共安全、市场经济、社会秩序,与刑法分则所在章节的其他罪名具有法益同一性。兜底罪名竞合应当以法条竞合与想象竞合的二分为前提,反对“大竞合论”的笼统适用。以行为单数联系结果为竞合具体判断标准,可以增强对其法益集体性的保护。兜底罪名法条竞合的复杂性体现在对独立竞合以及包含竞合的区分,兜底罪名想象竞合的肆意性源自对竞合的定位不清以及对重罪选择的标准争议。兜底罪名竞合解释的科学性构建,可以从竞合形式一致性、竞合事实符合性以及竞合价值融贯性三个角度出发。

The issue of competing bottom line charges focuses on the choice of whether the same illegal act constitutes a bottom line charge or a non bottom line charge.The legal interest of the crime involves public security,market economy,and social order,and has the same legal interest as other crimes in the specific chapters of the Criminal Law.We should oppose the general application of“grand concurrence theory”based on the premise of two parts:legal concurrence and imaginary concurrence.legal concurrence and imaginary concurrence.Taking the results of singular association of acts as the criterion for the specific judgment of competition and cooperation can enhance the protection of the collectivity of legal interests.The complexity of the competition of bottom line charges is reflected in the distinction between independent competition and inclusive competition.The arbitrary nature of imaginary conjunctive of full charges is due to the unclear positioning of conjunctive and the controversy on the criteria for the selection of felony.The scientific construction of the concurrence explanation of the crime of confession can start from three angles:concurrence form consistency,concurrence fact conformity and concurrence value consistency.