摘要
分壁塔比传统的精馏技术投资更低,能耗更省。以某石化连续重整装置的重整脱戊烷油为原料,采用常规脱C 6塔、脱C 7塔两塔模型和分壁塔模型分别进行模拟计算。研究表明:在相同的原料和分离要求下,分壁塔重沸负荷与常规两塔相比减少约30%,年节能经济效益1441万元。同时,分壁塔系统比常规两塔系统减少7台设备,设备购置费减少了18.6%。除了设备购置费,分壁塔流程设备数量少,设备安装、土建结构、仪表等费用都低于两塔流程。通过某石化装置3年多的工业运行经验,充分验证了分壁塔技术能够达到两塔流程的分离精度要求。分壁塔容易操控,运行平稳,产品各项指标符合设计要求。
Dividing-wall column has lower investment and less energy consumption than conventional distillation technology.In this paper,the Platforming depentanizer bottom products of a petrochemical company are used as the feedstock,and the conventional de-C6 column and de-C7 column model and the dividing-wall column model are used for simulation calculations,respectively.The study shows that with the same feedstock and separation requirements,the reboiling load of dividing-wall column is reduced by about 30%compared with that of the conventional two columns,with an annual energy-saving economic benefit of 14.41 million yuan.At the same time,the dividing-wall column system has seven less equipment than the conventional two-column system,reducing the equipment purchase cost by 18.6%.In addition to equipment purchase cost,the dividing-wall column has less equipment,and the costs of equipment installation,civil structure and instrumentation are lower than those of the two-column process.More than 3 years of industrial operation experience in a petrochemical company fully verifies that dividing-wall column technology can meet the separation accuracy requirements of two-column process.Dividing-wall column has the advantages of easy control and smooth operation,and its product quality and other indicators are in line with the design requirements.
作者
朱艳
Zhu Yan(SINOPEC Engineering Incorporation,Beijing,100101)
出处
《石油化工设计》
CAS
2024年第4期47-49,53,I0003,共5页
Petrochemical Design
关键词
分壁塔
连续重整
重整脱戊烷油
dividing-wall column/DWC
continuous catalytic reforming/CCR
Platforming depentanizer bottom product