被动干扰会引发主动行为吗?科技干扰对大学生手机冷落行为的影响

Does Passive Interference Induce Active Behavior?The Influence of Technoference on Phubbing Among College Students

为探讨科技干扰与大学生手机冷落行为的关系,以及无手机恐惧、环境敏感性和社会比较倾向在其中的作用,研究采用科技干扰量表、环境敏感性量表、无手机恐惧量表中文版、社会比较倾向量表中文版和手机冷落行为量表中文版对2000名大学生进行调查。结果显示:(1)在控制性别和年龄之后,科技干扰显著正向影响大学生手机冷落行为;(2)无手机恐惧在科技干扰与大学生手机冷落行为之间起部分中介作用;(3)环境敏感性和社会比较倾向分别调节“科技干扰→无手机恐惧→手机冷落行为”这一中介作用的前半段路径和后半段路径。简而言之,科技干扰与手机冷落行为之间既存在中介效应,又存在调节效应。该研究揭示了科技干扰与手机冷落行为的关系及其个体差异,为降低大学生的手机冷落行为提供实证支持和理论依据。

In order to explore the relationship between technoference and college students’phubbing,as well as the roles of nomophobia,environmental sensitivity and social comparison orientation,this study used the Technoference Scale,Environmental Sensitivity Scale,Chinese Version of Nomophobia Scale,Social Comparative Orientation Scale and Phubbing Scale to survey 2000 students.The results showed that:1)technoference significantly negatively predicted college students’phubbing when the influences of gender and age were controlled;2)nomophobia partially mediated the relationship between technoference and phubbing;3)the first and second half of the mediating pathways of technoference,nomophobia,and college students’phubbing were moderated by environmental sensitivity and social comparison orientation.In short,there are both mediating and moderating effects between technoference and college students’phubbing.The current study reveals the relationship between technoference and college students’phubbing and individual differences,which provides empirical support and theoretical basis for reducing college students’phubbing behavior.