基于PMC指数模型的我国高校高水平运动队政策量化评价

Quantitative Evaluation of High-Level Sports Team Policy in Chinese Universities Based on PMC Index Model

政策是指导高校高水平运动队建设工作提质增效的行动指南。量化评价高校高水平运动队政策对完善其政策体系、促进其高质量服务于学校体育发展和国家竞技人才培养具有重要的理论与现实意义。基于PMC指数模型,本研究构建了涵盖9个一级变量和40个二级变量的政策量化评价体系,并利用PMC指数和PMC曲面图对6部代表性政策进行评价。结果显示:(1)政策的PMC指数均值为6.62,凹陷指数为2.38,整体表现为优秀。其中优秀级别政策4项,可接受级别政策2项,表明政策总体设计较为合理。(2)政策具有一定的趋同性,多在政策领域、政策评价、政策功能及政策内容等方面具有优势;在政策级别、政策效力、激励保障等方面相对薄弱。具体表现为政策预测性不足、政策效力缺乏短中期目标设置、激励保障手段不完善、不充分等。(3)未来政策制定过程中应增添政策的预测性内容,设置长、中、短期相结合的目标规划;构建动态、立体的政策执行监测与评估机制;丰富政策激励手段和强化政策保障措施;坚持和完善民主决策制度,提升政策制定质量。

The policy is the action guide to improve the quality and efficiency of the construction of high-level sports teams in universities and colleges.The quantitative evaluation of the policy of high-level sports teams in universities and colleges has important theoretical and practical significance to improve the policy system and promote their high-quality service to the development of school sports and the training of national competitive talents.Based on PMC index model,a policy quantitative evaluation system covering 9 first-level variables and 40 second-level variables is constructed,and 6 representative policies are evaluated by PMC index and PMC surface diagram.The results show that firstly the average PMC index of the policies is 6.62,the sink index is 2.38,and the overall performance is excellent,including 4 excellent level policies and 2 acceptable level policies,indicating that the overall policy design is reasonable.Secondly,policies have certain convergence,and most of them have advantages in policy fields,policy evaluation,policy functions and policy content;it is relatively weak in policy level,policy effectiveness,incentive guarantee and other aspects,which are reflected in the lack of policy prediction,the lack of short and medium-term goal setting of policy effectiveness,and the imperfect and insufficient incentive guarantee means.Lastly,in the future policymaking process,it is suggested to add the predictive content of policies,set long-term,medium and short-term goal planning;establish a dynamic and three-dimensional monitoring and evaluation mechanism for policy implementation;enrich policy incentives and strengthen policy safeguards;and uphold and improve the democratic decision-making system and improve the quality of policy making.