“环境”的规范性解释与体系性展开

Normative interpretation and systematic development of"environment"

我国环境立法和学理研究中对“环境”概念的使用并未建立起规范性意义脉络,司法对“环境”概念的解释也不一致,其主要原因是将“生态”“资源”作为与“环境”相并列的客体而导致概念的持续繁衍。基础概念的解释应回归实证法,“环境”应作为唯一的抽象概念以解决当前概念混乱问题。但抽象概念的意义空洞化以及分离式思维可能会破坏法律的体系性与调整对象的整体性,因此,“生态”“资源”可作为类型概念以帮助把握抽象概念“环境”的特征。由于我国环境立法中类型概念与抽象概念之间的关系尚未得到阐释,“环境”概念的规范性意义始终未能得到澄清。环境立法应以抽象概念和类型思维整合基础概念范畴,以推动环境法教义学的发展。

The use of the concept of"environment"in China's environmental legislation and scientific research has not established the normative meaning of the context,and the interpretation of the concept of"environment"in the judicial system is inconsistent,the core reason is that the concept of"ecology"and"resources"is taken as the object of"environment",which leads to the sustainable reproduction of the concept.The interpretation of basic concepts should return to the positive method,and"environment"should be the only abstract concept to solve the current conceptual confusion.However,the hollowing of the meaning of the abstract concept and the separate thinking may destroy the systematization of the law and the integrity of the object of adjustment.Therefore,"ecology"and"resources"can be used as type concepts to help grasp the characteristics of the abstract concept"environment".The normative meaning of the concept of"environment"has not been clarified since the relationship between the type concept and the abstract concept has not been explained in our environmental legislation.Environmental legislation should integrate basic concept category with abstract concept and type thinking to promote the construction of environmental law doctrine.