语类思想下学术阅读的闭环路径:延展-溯因法

A genre based closed-loop perspective to research paper reading: Extension-abductive approach

在审阅硕士、博士学位论文或参加他们的论文答辩时,发现论文中的“文献综述”部分大多数是对他人文献的罗列,论文作者在没有深度分析和评价文献研究发现或结论的情况下,匆忙做出非针对性的判断,并以此作为论文选题的动因或依据。导致这种现象发生的一个原因可能是,论文作者启动论文写作前没有把握所读文献的来龙去脉以及学术观点和研究结果的合理性。为解决这个问题,本文在语类思想的指导下尝试提出学术阅读的“延展-溯因”阅读法。延展阅读的路径是从宏观主位走向宏观新信息,溯因阅读的路径是从宏观信息反推上溯至宏观主位。此外,本文在分析学术论文语类结构时,不仅讨论阶段之间的实现关系,还讨论了阶段之间的附生关系。本文对大语篇语义研究有一定的启示作用。

When reviewing dissertations by MA or PhD candidates or participating in their dissertationdefense, I found that most of the “literature review” in their dissertation is listing other scholars' literature without in-depth analysis nor evaluation of the findings of the literature. The research topic of the dissertation is likely chosen out of the unfair assessment of the literature cited. One reason for this conduct may be that the author of the dissertation is not sure about nor understandingthe intentionality as well as the rationality of the cited literature before writing the dissertation. To address this issue, this paper tries to put forward the “extension-abductive” approach to reading research papers under the guidance of the genre theory. Extension starts from Macro Theme to Macro New of a research paper. Abductive starts from Macro New upto Macro Theme. In addition, this paper discusses not only the realization relation between the stages in the research paper, but also the supervenient relation between the stages. This paper may have implications for discourse semantic analysis.