期刊文献+

肩关节镜下双排锚钉固定缝合术与单排锚钉固定缝合术治疗巨大肩袖损伤患者的效果比较

Comparison of effects of double-row suture anchor fixation and single-row suture anchor fixation under shoulder arthroscopy in treatment of patients with massive rotator cuff injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较肩关节镜下双排锚钉固定缝合术与单排锚钉固定缝合术治疗巨大肩袖损伤患者的效果。方法:回顾性分析2021年3月至2022年10月该院收治的87例巨大肩袖损伤患者的临床资料,依照手术方式不同将其分为对照组(n=43)与观察组(n=44)。对照组行单排锚钉固定缝合术治疗,观察组行双排锚钉固定缝合术治疗。比较两组治疗效果,术前及术后3个月肩关节功能[Constant-Murley肩关节功能(CMS)]评分、疼痛程度[数字分级评分法(NRS)]评分、肩关节活动度(外旋、前屈、外展、后伸、内收),术后1年肩袖再损伤发生率。结果:术后6个月,观察组治疗效果优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后3个月,两组CMS评分高于术前,且观察组高于对照组,两组NRS评分低于术前,且观察组低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后3个月,两组肩关节外旋、前屈、外展、后伸、内收活动度均高于术前,且观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1年,观察组肩袖再损伤发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:双排锚钉固定缝合术治疗巨大肩袖损伤患者可提高治疗效果,减轻疼痛,改善肩关节功能和活动度,降低肩袖再损伤发生率,效果优于单排锚钉固定缝合术治疗。 Objective:To compare effects of double-row suture anchor fixation and single-row suture anchor fixation under shoulder arthroscopy in treatment of patients with massive rotator cuff injury.Methods:The clinical data of 87 patients with massive rotator cuff injury admitted to this hospital from March 2021 to October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different surgical methods,they were divided into control group(n=43)and observation group(n=44).The control group was treated with single-row suture anchor fixation,while the observation group was treated with double-row suture anchor fixation.The treatment effects,the shoulder joint function[Constant-Murley score(CMS)]scores,the pain degree[numerical rating scale(NRS)]score,the shoulder range of motion(external rotation,anteflexion,abduction,posterior extension,adduction)before and 3 months after the surgery,and the incidence of rotator cuff re-injury 1 year after the surgery were compared between the two groups.Results:Six months after the surgery,the treatment effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Three months after the surgery,the CMS scores of the two groups were higher than those before the surgery,and that in the observation group was higher than that in the control group;the NRS scores of the two groups were lower than those before the surgery,and that in the observation group was lower than that in the control group;and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Three months after the surgery,the ranges of external rotation,anteflexion,abduction,posterior extension,adduction of shoulder joint in the two groups were higher than those before the surgery,those in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Further,1 year after the surgery,the incidence of rotator cuff re-injury in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:Double-row anchor fixation and suturing surgery can improve the treatment effect for patients with huge rotator cuff injuries,reduce the pain,improve the shoulder joint function and range of motion,and reduce the incidence of rotator cuff reinjury.Moreover,it is superior to single row suture anchor fixation.
作者 裴志超 PEI Zhichao(Department of Orthopedics of Henan Hongli Hospital,Xinxiang 453400 Henan,China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2024年第23期149-151,155,共4页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 肩关节镜 双排锚钉固定缝合术 单排锚钉固定缝合术 巨大肩袖损伤 肩关节功能 肩关节活动度 Shoulder arthroscopy Double-row suture anchor fixation Single-row suture anchor fixation Massive rotator cuff injury Shoulder joint function Shoulder range of motion
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献97

  • 1王云峰,徐伟,宋舸,孙策勇,王路军.关节镜下肩袖修补术联合富血小板血浆治疗肩袖撕裂损伤68例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,0(3):66-69. 被引量:13
  • 2Layman YJ,Horton FM,Davidhizar R.Nursing attitudes and beliefs in pain assessment and management.J Adv Nurs,2006,53(4):412~421.
  • 3Barr J,Fraser GL,Puntillo K,et al.Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain,agitation,and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit.Crit Care Med,2013,41(1):263~306.
  • 4Carlson CL.Use of three evidence-based postoperative pain assessment practices by registered nurses.Pain Manag Nurs,2009,10(4):174~187.
  • 5Azzam PN,Alam A.Pain in the ICU:A Psychiatric Perspective.J Intensive Care Med,2012.
  • 6Flynn MM.Pain management in the nonverbal critically ill patient J Perianesth Nurs,2013,28(2):98~101.
  • 7Pudas-Tahka SM,Axelin A,Aantaa R,et al.Pain assessment tools for unconscious or sedated intensive care patients:a systematic review.J Adv Nurs,2009,65(5):946~956.
  • 8Voepel-Lewis T,Zanotti J,Dammeyer JA,et al.Reliability and validity of the face,legs,activity,cry,consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.Am J Crit Care,2010,19(1):55~61,62.
  • 9Puntillo KA,Stannard D,Miaskowski C,et al.Use of a pain assessment and intervention notation(P.A.I.N.)tool in critical care nursing practice:nurses'evaluations.Heart Lung,2002,31(4):303~314.
  • 10Polit DF,Beck CT,Owen SV.Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity?Appraisal and recommendations.Res Nurs Health,2007,30(4):459~467.

共引文献414

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部