期刊文献+

经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉支架植入的研究 被引量:6

Implantation of the Coronary Artery Stents via the Radial Artery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉支架植入治疗的可行性和安全性。方法 :选择我院 2 0 0 1年 12月到2 0 0 2年 10月住院、Allen’s试验阳性病人 3 0例 ,使用 6F桡动脉鞘行PTCA、支架植入。结果 :3 0例中发现病变 41处 ,对其中 3 4处进行了治疗 ,单纯PTCA4处 ,3 0处病变植入支架 3 5枚。经统计学处理 ,提示术前狭窄 87.4%± 7.9% ,术后无残余狭窄。平均桡动脉穿刺时间为 2 .8± 1.6分钟 ,一次桡动脉穿刺成功率 90 % ,术前和术后 2 4小时Allen’s试验时间无显著性差异 ,并发症少。结论 :本研究提示 ,经桡动脉途径植入冠状动脉支架安全可行、手术成功率高、血管并发症少、无需限制体位 ,可作为冠状动脉支架植入术的首选血管途径。 Objective: We aimed to get experiences of implantation of coronary artery stents via the radial artery and evaluate its feasibility and safety. Methods: 30 Allen's positive cases were treated, who were admitted during the period of December, 2001 to October, 2002. PTCA stents were implanted and 6F radial artery sheath system was used. Results: Among the 30 successful cases, 41 lesions were found, 34 of which were treated. Single PTCA were four. 35 stents were implanted in 30 vessel lesions. The statistics showed that vessel stenosis before the implantation was 87.4% + 7.9% and the residual stenosis after the implantation was not found. The average time of radial artery puncture was 2.8+1.6 minutes. The successful rate of the radial artery puncture in the first time was 90%. There were no remarkable differences in Allen's test time between the 24 hours before and after the implantation and its complications were rare. Conclusion: The results showed that the method was a safe and feasible approach with advantages of high successful implantation rate, few vessel complications and unnecessary postural limitation, and it might be the main choose in the implantation of coronary stents.
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2002年第11期63-65,共3页 Hainan Medical Journal
关键词 经桡动脉途径 冠状动脉支架植入 可行性 安全性 介入治疗 冠心病 the radial artery stent the coronary artery
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1]Campeau L.Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography.Cachet Cardiovasc Diagn,1989,16:3-7.
  • 2[2]Kiemeneij F,Laarman GJ,Melker E.Transradial artery coronary angioplasty.Am Heart J,1995,129:1-7.
  • 3[3]Kiemeneij F,Laarman GJ,Odekerken D,et al.A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial,brachial and femoral approaches:The access study.J Am Coll Cardiol,1997,29:1269-1275.
  • 4[4]Mintz GS,Popma JJ,Pichard AD,et al.Arterial remodeling after coronary angioplasty.A serial intravascular ultrasound study.Circulation,1996,94:35-43.
  • 5[5]Kikuchi Y,Endou N,Terashima M,et al.Incidence of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary intervention in the Japanese population.Jpn J Interv Cardiol,2000,15:343-347.
  • 6[6]Wakeyama T,Ogawa H,Iida H,et al.Radial artery remodeling after transradial catheterization.Jpn J Interv Cardiol,2001,16:243-247.

共引文献83

同被引文献18

  • 1韩旭晨,王凯,田红梅,祁红,杨忆薇,周丽娜,赵学丽.急诊PTCA及支架术治疗急性心肌梗死[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2006,38(4):328-330. 被引量:1
  • 2韩雅玲.老年急性心肌梗死的再灌注治疗[J].临床内科杂志,2007,24(1):8-10. 被引量:18
  • 3李村淑,姚福梅,严惠玲.急性心肌梗死患者经股动脉和桡动脉途径行PCI术的临床对比观察[J].中国误诊学杂志,2007,7(9):2006-2007. 被引量:3
  • 4傅向华.经桡动脉人径直接冠状动脉血管成形术治疗急性心肌梗死的可行性研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2002,30:142-145.
  • 5陈秀美.实用肾脏病学[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1999:495.
  • 6Ronen J,Tony H,Waseem S,et al.Comparison ofradialversus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2007,69(6):815-820.
  • 7Yakubov SJ ,George BS. Brachial and radial approach to coronary-intervention. In: Freed M, Grines C, Safian RD, eds. The newrnaiual of interventional cardiology [ M ] . Michigan: Physician ' s Press, 1996,65.
  • 8Saito S, Mitake S, Hosokawa G, et al. Tuansradial coronary-intervention in J apanese patients[ J ]. Cat heter Cardiovasc Interv,1999,46:37.
  • 9傅向华.经桡动脉入径直接冠状动脉血管成形术治疗急性心肌梗死的可行性研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2002,30(2):142-142.
  • 10Yakubov SJ, George BS. Brachial and radial approach to coronary-intervention. In: Freed M. Grines C, Safian RD, eds. The newmaiual of interventional cardiology [M]. Michigan: Physician's Press, 1996:65 -73.

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部