期刊文献+

注射用阿莫西林钠-舒巴坦钠治疗细菌性感染的临床随机对照试验 被引量:3

Clinical randomized controlled trial of Amoxycillin-sulbactam injection in the treatment of bacterial infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :通过以阿莫西林钠 克拉维酸钾 (安灭菌 )为对照药进行临床研究 ,评价阿莫西林钠 舒巴坦钠治疗常见致病菌引起的细菌感染性疾病的临床疗效和安全性。 方法 :采用随机对照盲法平行试验设计 ,入选病例 4 8例 ,脱落 1例 ,完成 4 7例。其中呼吸道感染 2 3例 ,泌尿系统感染 2 4例。试验组 (2 4例 )应用注射用阿莫西林钠 舒巴坦钠 1.5g/次 ,每 12h或 8h一次静滴 ;对照组 (2 3例 )应用安灭菌 1.2 g/次 ,每 12h或 8h一次静滴。疗程均为7~ 14天。 结果 :阿莫西林钠 舒巴坦钠治疗呼吸道感染、泌尿系统感染的痊愈率和有效率分别为 91.6 6 %和10 0 %、83.33%和 91.6 7% ,总痊愈率和有效率为 87.5 0 %和 95 .83% ,与安灭菌对照组比较无显著差异。阿莫西林钠 舒巴坦钠对分离细菌的清除率为 10 0 %。应用注射用阿莫西林钠 舒巴坦钠未见严重不良反应 ,仅发生皮疹 1例、恶心 3例 ,总发生率为 16 .6 7% (4 / 2 4 ) ,与安灭菌对照组比较无显著差异。 结论 :四类新药阿莫西林钠 舒巴坦钠对临床常见致病菌引起的呼吸道、泌尿系统感染 ,尤其是产酶菌引起的严重感染 ,临床疗效较好 ,使用安全 。 Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Amoxycillin sulbactam injection compared with Amoxycillin clavulanic acid injection in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. Methods:A total of 47 patients (23 with respiratory tract infections and 24 with urinary tract infections)were included in this study, 24 cases treated with Amoxycillin sulbactam were compared with 23 cases treated with Amoxycillin clavulanic acid. Drugs were administered intravenously at a dose of 1.5 g of Amoxycillin sulbactam or 1.2 g of Amoxycillin clavulanic acid, q 12 h or q 8 h for 7~14 days. Results:The overall clinical efficacious rates of Amoxycillin sulbactam was 95.83%. There was no significant difference( P >0.05) between Amoxycillin sulbactam and Amoxycillin clavulanic acid in the clinical efficacy and bacterial clearance rates. The incidence of adverse drug reactions(16.67%) for Amoxycillin sulbactam was low, and no severe adverse drug reactions were found. Conclusions:Amoxycillin sulbactam injection is an effective and safe antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial infection.
出处 《医学研究生学报》 CAS 2002年第5期427-430,共4页 Journal of Medical Postgraduates
关键词 阿莫西林钠-舒巴坦钠 治疗 细菌性感染 临床 随机对照试验 Amoxycillin Sulbactam Clavulanic acid Bacterial infection Randomized controlled trials
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1吕媛,李家泰,单爱莲.β-内酰胺酶抑制剂与β-内酰胺类抗生素联合应用的抗菌作用评价[J].中国临床药理学杂志,1998,14(1):53-57. 被引量:48
  • 2Livermore DM. Determinants of the activity of β-Lactamase inhibitor combinations[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother,1993,31(Suppl A):9-21.
  • 3Mclaughlin JC, Barry AL, Fuchs PC, et al. In-vitro activity of five β-Lactam/β-Lactamase inhibitor combinations against consecutive, isolates of the enterobacteriaceae and pseudomonas[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother,1994,33:223-230.
  • 4Piddock LJV, Fangjin Y, Turner HL. Activity of 13-β-Lactam agents combined with BRL-42715 against β-Lactamase producing Gram-negative bacteria compared to combinations with clavulanic acid, tazobactam and sulbactam[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother,1993,31:89-103.
  • 5Pfaller M, Barry A, Fuchs P, et al. Relative efficacy of tazobactam, sulbactam and clavulanic acid in enhancing the potency of ampicillin against clinical isolates of enterobacteriaceae[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis,1993,12:200-205.
  • 6张永龙,李家泰.β内酰胺酶抑制剂——他佐巴坦与舒巴坦抑酶作用比较研究[J].中国药理学通报,1998,14(2):133-137. 被引量:11

共引文献54

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部