3Sandrik JM, Wagner RF. Absolute measures of physical image quality: measurement and application to radiographic magnification. Med Phys,1982, 9:540-549.
4岸本健治.ノィズ特性： 基楚とCR[J].日放技会谂,1991,47:854-857.
5Antonuk LE, Jee KW, El-Mohri Y, et al. Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic X-ray applications. Med Phys, 2000,27:289-306.
7Tucker DM, Barnes GT, Chakraborty DP. Semiempirical model for generating tungsten target X-ray spectra. Med Phys, 1991, 18:211-218.
8HobertK.GE digital detectorのデザィソにつぃて[J].日放技会谂,1999,55:744-751.
9Wolf M, Ricke J, Gurvich V,et al. Accuracy of specification of dose reference values and detail detecatability by a statistical phantom. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1998,80:317-320.
6[1]shearer D R, Bopaiah M. Health phys 79(2) supplement: S 20- S,2001, 22.
7Roehrig H, Krupinski E, Dallas W. Lemki HU, et al. Necessary spatial resolution in digital mammography[J]. Computer Assisted Radiology. Elsevier Science, 1996.53-9.
8Goo JM, Lm JG, Kim JH, et al. Digital chest radiography with a selenium- based flat- panel detector versus astorage phosphor system: comparison of soft - copy images[J]. A JR, 2000, 175 (4) : 1013 - 1018.
9Lucia JM, Woutor ,IH, Bart JA, et al. Comparison of light different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simu - lated chest disease[J]. AJR, 2005, 185 (2): 339 -340.
10Launders JH, Cowen AR, Bury RF, et al. Towords image quality, beam energy and effective dose optimisation in digital thoracic radiography [J], Eur Radiol, 2001, 11 (2): 870 - 875.
