物权行为论

On juristic act of real right

当前,物权行为理论有三个问题需要深入探讨:(1)概念上,登记或交付应为物权行为的生效要件。法定的登记或交付方式是为对物权行为效力予以干预和评价,而法律行为成立采自由主义,所以登记或交付应为其生效要件。(2)性质上,物权行为应为独立的法律行为。物权行为中存在着独立的、客观的意思表示,故可以并应适用法律行为的一系列规则。(3)关于物权行为的有因性或无因性,本文主张物权行为应采有因性,这样才符合法律的公平正义观念。物权行为的独立性与有因性并存并不矛盾,物权行为无因性保护交易安全的功能可由公示公信原则代替,而公示公信原则与物权行为无因性理论并无实质联系。

The theory of juristic act of real right has three problems to be solved:(1)The difinition.Tradition and register should be the effective factor of real right act.The tradition and register provided by the law is to interfere and evaluate the effect of real right act,but the found of juristic act belongs to freedom doctrine,tradition and register should be the effective factor of real right act.(2)The nature.Juristic act of real right should be an independent juristic act.The act of real right contains independent and objective willenserklarung.The act of real right can and should apply the successive rules of juristic act.(3)About the juristic fair of unfair.It is suggested that the real right act should be kausale geschafte,so it can conform to the concept of fair and justic.The independence and abstractness of real right act aren't contradication.The function of abstractness of real right act to protect the safety of transaction can be insteaded by demonstrative principle of real right,but demonstrative principle of real right hasn't substantive relation with the abstractness of real right act.