中国情报学研究范式的冲突与思考

Conflict in the Research Paradigm of Information Science and Some Reflections

《中华人民共和国国家情报法》颁布和实施、《情报学与情报工作发展南京共识》发布、情报学一级学科建设的讨论成为焦点,这些大事件意味着中国情报学面临着新的发展机遇。多年来,情报学一直存在着研究对象的"信息"和"情报"之争。从历史发展的视角看,情报工作和信息工作有着悠久的历史渊源,情报和信息不可分割,它们之间存在着密切的相互转化关系。中国情报学在发展过程中,逐步形成了面向决策服务的情报范式和面向社会服务的信息范式两大研究范式,两大范式各有特点,在新时代需要融合与携手发展。2017年是情报学发展的转折点,其学科发展动态标志着中国情报学开始从粗放式发展走向精细化发展的道路,情报学开始厘清概念之间的交融关系、明确学科基本体系构成、构筑不同研究范式的基本框架,融合更多关联学科的学术资源。

The promulgation and implementation of the National Intelligence Law of the People’s Republic of China in 2017,the publication of the Nanjing Consensus on the Development of Information Science and Information Work and discussions on the construction of the first-level discipline of information science have become the foci in the academia,which brings the information science new opportunities.For many years,there is a long-term dispute of research objects between'information'and'intelligence'in the field information science.From the perspective of historical development,intelligence work and information work have long historical origins.Intelligence and information are inseparable and mutually transformed.In the process of development,China’s information science has gradually formed two research paradigms,namely,the information paradigm for decision-making services and the information paradigm for social services.The two paradigms have their own characteristics,and they need integration and joint development in the new era.The year of 2017 is a turning point of China’s information science which began to develop from the extensive style to the refined style.The information science began to clarify the conceptual confusions,define the basic system of disciplines,construct the basic framework of different research paradigms,and absorb the academic resources of more related disciplines.