摘要
运用权势和等同理论分析2016年美国总统大选三场辩论中主持人、希拉里、特朗普的称呼语使用情况,发现主持人与两位总统候选人之间的权势地位处在动态变化中,希拉里使用较稳定的称呼语宣称自己的权势地位,而特朗普则通过变换对希拉里的称呼来挑战其权势。由此可见,称呼语的使用一方面能直接表明两位候选人的身份、地位、态度等信息,另一方面也呈现了他们在这场"政治博弈"中的不满态度及敌对关系。
The use of address forms can directly indicate speakers' identity,status,attitude,etc.Based on power and solidarity theory,the paper intends to analyze address forms used in three American presidential debates in 2016. It can be concluded that moderators' power is frequently changing; Hillary claims her power through constant use of address forms; whereas Trump constantly changes address forms to challenge Hillary's power. Dissatisfaction and hospitality between two candidates in this political game can be seen vividly through their use of address forms.
出处
《广东外语外贸大学学报》
2017年第5期110-117,共8页
Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
关键词
权势
等同
称呼语
敌对关系
电视辩论
power and solidarity
address forms
hostility
televised debates
