摘要
间接受害人范围的确定,我国理论界与实务界仍然存在重大争议,立法上不尽统一,审判中也是差别巨大。围绕胎儿能否成为扶养损害赔偿的主体,间接受害人是否应当包括有扶养期待权的权利人等困惑,笔者从制度完善、利益保障的角度提出自己的思考。
The scope of indirect,theoretical and practical circles major controversy still exists,legislation,trial is not big differences.Around the fetus can be raised the subject,indirect damages whether the victim shall include the right holder to support such confusion,from the system consummation,the interests of the proposed own view guarantee.
出处
《改革与开放》
2009年第8X期12-12,共1页
Reform & Openning
关键词
受害人
胎儿
扶养期待权
Indirect victim Fetus Expectation of maintenance right