西方主流舆论对安倍政府历史修正主义的认知

The Perception of the Historical Revisionism of the Abe Administration in Western Mainstream Public Opinion

西方主流舆论对安倍政府历史修正主义的批判存在独特的规范取向和安全考量。与中、韩等国对日本右翼修正主义的反侵略、反殖民的主导性认知范式不同,西方主流舆论更多诉诸西方盛行的人权和"历史正义"范式。东西方舆论对安倍政府的历史修正主义的认知都夹杂着安全顾虑。中、韩等东亚国家从历史修正主义感受到日本军国主义卷土重来的可能危险。而西方舆论主要担心历史修正主义导致中日之间的紧张局势失控,担心日、韩这两个美国最重要的东亚盟国之间裂痕加大给中国可乘之机。此种立场主要体现了美国在东亚推行战略再平衡的安全考量。因为安倍的历史修正主义,日本的和平主义形象已经被颠覆,西方舆论对日本右翼民族主义的担忧明显上升。与此同时,出于意识形态和安全利益的考量,西方舆论也表现出其偏狭和偏见。

The criticism of the historical revisionism of the Abe Administration from Western mainstream public opinion has its unique norms orientation and security considerations. Different from the dominant paradigm of anti- aggression and anti- colonial perception against Japanese right- wing revisionism in China,South Korea and other countries,the Western mainstream public opinion has more to do with the paradigms of human rights and ' historical justice' that are prevalent in the West. There are security concerns mixed in the perception of the historical revisionism of the Abe Administration in both Eastern and Western public opinion. China,South Korea and other East Asian countries feel potential danger from a resurgence of Japanese militarism in the historical revisionism,while the main concerns of Western public opinion for the historical revisionism are that it may lead to the tensions between China and Japan out of control,and the growing rift be-tween Japan and South Korea,the two most important U. S. allies in East Asia,may open up opportunities of which China can take advantage. Such position mainly reflects the security considerations of the United States to implement the strategy of rebalancing in East Asia. Because of Abe's historical revisionism,Japan's pacifist image has been subverted,and the concerns of Western public opinion over Japan's right- wing nationalism are rising obviously. At the same time,due to the considerations of ideology and security interests,Western public opinion also shows its parochialism and prejudice.