期刊文献+

武力使用是否适宜?——领土争端中的利益与政策辨析 被引量:1

Is it Appropriate to Use Force?——An Analysis of the Interest and Policy in Territorial Disputes
原文传递
导出
摘要 领土争端一般被认为是传统安全议题,但这种认识中常常潜藏着过度安全化的风险,从而成为国际冲突的重要根源。这是因为,不同的领土争端,所涉及的利益并不一样,并不一定都与国家安全有关,既无法也不应都通过武力解决。从政策适宜性的角度来看,如果涉及主权和领土完整,影响到国家及其政权、人民的生存状况和安全态势,在一定的条件下运用武力是可以理解的。如果仅仅涉及资源获取和分配这样的物质利益,动用武力既不应该也不必要。如果涉及的是地位、威望和尊严等国家精神利益,一般也不得使用武力。目前各国政策实践中一个比较广泛存在的误区是:许多以安全利益之名制定的领土政策,实际上是出于获得资源等物质利益方面的考虑,其结果是导致对武力的过度使用,从而恶化、损害了地区甚至本国的安全形势和利益。为了避免这种过度安全化的情况,必须对不同争端所涉及的安全、发展和精神利益进行细致评估,并将利益程度与武力使用严格挂钩。只有据此制定出来的领土政策,才能真正有利于国家利益。 Territorial disputes are generally considered as traditional security issues,but there is often a risk of overly putting them on the security side lurks in this understanding,therefore becoming a major source of international conflicts. This is because the interests involved in different territorial disputes are not the same and not necessarily related to national security,they cannot and should not resolved by force.From the perspective of policy appropriateness,if they involve the sovereignty and territorial integrity,and affect the living conditions and the security situation of the country and its government and the people,the use of force is understandable under certain conditions. If material interests such as acquisition and allocation of resources are involved only,force should not be used and it is unnecessary to do. If national spiritual interests such as status,prestige and dignity are involved,the use of force is prohibited in general. There is a relatively widespread mistake in the practice of national policy currently: many territorial policies formulated in the name of security interests are in fact out of consideration for material interests such as the acquisition of resources,resulting in excessive use of force and exacerbating the damages to the region and even the country's own security situation and interests. To avoid this case of excessively emphasizing the security side,one must carefully assess the security,development and spiritual interests involved in different disputes and strictly link the extent of interests to the use of force. Only territorial policy worked out accordingly can truly benefit the national interest.
作者 李开盛
出处 《国际关系研究》 2015年第1期71-84,154-155,共16页 Journal of International Relations
基金 笔者主持的国家社会科学基金项目"中美东亚冲突管控机制研究"(14BGJ050)的阶段性成果
关键词 领土争端 安全化 安全利益 物质利益 精神利益 territorial dispute,securitization of territorial disputes,security interests,material interests,spiritual interests
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Birger Heldt.'Domestic Politics,Absolute Deprivation,and the Use of Armed Force in Interstate Territorial Disputes,1950-1990,'. The Journal of Conflict Resolution . 1999
  • 2Stephen A.Kocs.'Territorial Disputes and Interstate War,1945-1987,'. The Journal of Politics . 1995
  • 3蔡拓,唐静.全球化时代国家利益的定位与维护[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2001(5):8-14. 被引量:8
  • 4王子昌.东盟国家间领土争端的解决:做法、争论与启示[J].东南亚研究,2007(4):25-28. 被引量:9
  • 5Arie M.Kacowicz.'The Problem of Peaceful Territorial Change,'. International Studies Quarterly . 1994
  • 6Rita Taureck.Securitization theory and securitization studies. Journal of International Relations and Development . 2006
  • 7John Vasquez,Marie T.Henehan.'Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War,1816-1992,'. Journal of Peace Research . 2001
  • 8Sara Mc Laughlin Mitchell,Brandon C.Prins.'Beyond Territorial Contiguity:Issues at Stake in Democratic Militarized Interstate Disputes,'. International Studies Quarterly .
  • 9李少军.论国家利益[J].世界经济与政治,2003(1):4-9. 被引量:72
  • 10Fravel M Taylor.'Power Shifts and Escalation Explaining China’’s Use of Force in Territorial Disputes'. International Security . 2007

二级参考文献51

  • 1李辉,张学刚.印尼与马来西亚安巴拉特领海争端概况[J].国际资料信息,2005(5):10-13. 被引量:8
  • 2邓小平.《在武昌、深圳、珠海、上海等地的谈话要点》[A]..《邓小平文选》第3卷[C].人民出版社,1993年版.第370-371页.
  • 3宋新宁 陈岳.国际政治学概论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000..
  • 4.《邓小平文选》第三卷[M].人民出版社,1993年10月版.第166页.
  • 5阎学通.《中国国家利益分析》[M].天津人民出版社,1997年版.第45-54页.
  • 6李铁城.《联合国的历程》[M].北京:北京语言学院出版社,1993年版.第29页,第123页,第129页.
  • 7Jr. Chas. W. Freeman, ArU of Prover-Statecraft and Diplomacy, Washington, D. C. : United States Institute of Peace Press, 1997, p. 41.
  • 8Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (6^th edition), New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. , 1985, p. 87.p.352-3.p.95.p.353.p.97-100.353-4.
  • 9Alexander Wendt, " Construction of International Politics, in International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1995,p. 73.
  • 10Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace ( 6^th edition), New York : Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. , 1985, p. 87.

共引文献92

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部