期刊文献+

东盟管理争端机制及其效用分析 被引量:3

The Management of ASEAN Dispute Settlement Mechanisms and Their Utility Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 东盟的成立不仅源于东南亚各国应对冷战时期美苏之间的激烈博弈,而且源于各国之间存在着严重的领土主权争端。东盟自成立以来,通过了一系列关于应对各成员国领土主权争端的政策文件,并提出了相应的组织程序和运行规范。然而,迄今为止,东盟各成员国或者没有启动过东盟管理和解决争端机制,或者未批准有可能对自己具有强制力的文件。东盟成员国在维持地区安全局势总体稳定的情况下,通过多年的双边外交谈判,或者通过诉诸东盟外争端解决机制,特别是国际法院,解决了相互间的领土主权争端。东盟管理和解决争端机制存在着启动难、专业性弱、程序烦、决策政治性强和无执行力等缺点,无法得到东盟成员国的重视和尊重。东盟争端管理机制在南海问题上的适用性不强,但中国需要借鉴和利用东盟国家关于管理领土主权和海洋权益争端的经验和教训,在南海领土主权争端中获得更多的话语权,争取对自己有利的和平环境。 The establishment of ASEAN was not only derived from the countermeasure of the Southeast Asian countries to cope with the intense struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War,but also due to the existence of serious disputes of territorial sovereignty among them. Since its establishment,ASEAN adopted a series of policy documents and set the corresponding organizational procedures and operational norms to deal with the territorial disputes among its member states. However,ASEAN member countries have neither initiated ASEAN mechanisms to manage and settle their disputes nor ratified the documents that may be enforceable upon themselves to date. While maintaining the overall stability of the security situation in the region,ASEAN member countries have settled their territorial disputes among them either through years of bilateral diplomatic negotiations or by resorting to the mechanisms of dispute settlement outside ASEAN,the International Court in particular. ASEAN mechanisms of dispute management and settlement have the shortcomings such as the difficulty of initiating,weak professionalism,tiresome procedures,strong politicalized decision- making and poor enforceability,so they cannot be taken seriously and respected by the members of ASEAN. The applicability of ASEAN dispute management mechanisms on the South China Sea issue is not strong,but China needs to learn from and utilize the experience and lessons of ASEAN countries concerning the management of the territorial sovereignty disputes and maritime interests,get more say on territorial sovereignty disputes in the South China Sea,and strive for a peaceful environment to its advantage.
作者 周士新
出处 《国际关系研究》 2015年第5期80-95,156,共17页 Journal of International Relations
关键词 东盟 争端管理机制 效用分析 management of ASEAN dispute mechanism,utility analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献83

  • 1李国强.对解决南沙群岛主权争议几个方案的解析[J].中国边疆史地研究,2000,10(3):79-88. 被引量:25
  • 2[美]彼得·卡赞斯坦著,秦亚青等译.《地区构成的世界--美国帝权中的亚洲和欧洲》,北京:北京大学出版社,2007年版,第146页.
  • 3[美]彼得·卡赞斯坦著,秦亚青,魏玲译.《地区构成的世界--美国帝权中的亚洲和欧洲》,北京大学出版社,2007年,第146页.
  • 4East Asia Vision Group,Towards an East Asian Community:Region of Peace,Prosperity and Progress,2001.
  • 5Richard A.Bitzinger and Barry Desker,"Why East Asian War is Unlikely?",Survival,Vol.50,No.6,December 2008,pp.105-106.
  • 6Denny Roy,"Southeast Asia and China:Balancing or Bandwagoning?",Contemporary Southeast Asia,Vol.27,August 2005,pp.305-321.
  • 7Dennis C.Blair and John T.Hanley Jr.,"From Wheels to Webs:Reconstructing Asia-Pacific Security Arrangements",The Washington Quarterly,Vol.24,No.1,Winter 2001,pp.7-17.
  • 8Evelyn Goh,"The ASEAN Regional Forum in United States East Asia Strategy",The Pacific Review,Vol.17,No.1,March 2004,pp.47-69.
  • 9Aurelia George Mulgan,"Breaking the Mould:Japan's Subtle Shift from Exclusive Bilateralism to Modest Minilateralism",Contemporary Southeast Asia,Vol.30,No.1,April 2008,p.59.
  • 10Yeo Lay Hwee,"Japan,ASEAN,and the Construction of an East Asian Community",Contemporary Southeast Asia,Vol.28,No.2,August 2006,p.268.

共引文献40

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部