期刊文献+

东南亚国家海洋划界的政策选择 被引量:4

Policy Options on the Maritime Demarcation for Southeast Asian Countries
原文传递
导出
摘要 东南亚地区大多数国家之间都存在着许多边界争端,这对地区形势和国际关系造成了较大影响。从20世纪60年代开始,由于多方面的原因,东南亚国家越来越关注海洋划界问题,对解决海洋划界问题作出了较大的努力,体现出较明显的务实性、灵活性、合作性和妥协性,并取得了明显进展。东南亚国家主要通过双边或多边谈判方式来解决海洋划界问题,其中既有划定边界的协定,也有未能划定边界的临时安排,大大增强了国家间通过协商解决一些棘手问题的信心。在东南亚国家中,只有缅甸根据1982年《联合国海洋法公约》诉诸第三方争端解决机制解决与孟加拉国的海洋划界问题。从趋势来看,东南亚国家虽然对解决海洋划界问题具有较强的信心和意愿,但它们之间许多海洋划界问题仍有待得到妥善解决,否则将可能成为妨碍它们在更多领域开展多边合作的不利因素。 There are many border disputes among most countries in Southeast Asia,which has a great impact on the regional situation and international relations.Since the 1960s,due to various reasons,Southeast Asian countries have paid increasingly attention to the issues of maritime delimitation,made great efforts to solve them by presenting relatively visible pragmatism,flexibility,cooperation and compromise,and made significant progress.Southeast Asian countries have mainly solved the issues of maritime delimitation through bilateral or multilateral negotiations that have led to both the agreements on border demarcation and the temporary arrangements in which they failed to demarcate the boundaries,greatly enhancing the confidence of countries in solving some difficult problems through consultation.Among the Southeast Asian countries,only Myanmar has resorted to the third-party dispute settlement mechanism to resolve the issue of maritime delimitation with Bangladesh in accordance with the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.Seen from the perspective of trends,although Southeast Asian countries have strong confidence and willingness to resolve the issues of maritime delimitation,many issues of maritime delimitation among the countries still need to be properly resolved,otherwise they may become unfavorable factorsin multilateral cooperation in more fields.
作者 周士新 Zhou Shixin
出处 《国际关系研究》 CSSCI 2019年第1期13-32,154-155,共21页 Journal of International Relations
基金 国家社科基金重大课题项目<国家海洋治理体系研究>(项目编号:17ZDA172)的阶段性成果
关键词 海洋划界 东南亚 争端解决 外交谈判 国际法 maritime delimitation Southeast Asia dispute settlement diplomatic negotiations international law
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献70

  • 1李辉,张学刚.印尼与马来西亚安巴拉特领海争端概况[J].国际资料信息,2005(5):10-13. 被引量:8
  • 2Permanent Court of Arbitration, Bangladesh v. Indian, 2009, PCA Website, http ://www. pca - cpa. org/showpage, asp? pag_id : 1376.
  • 3Jared Bissinger, Leaders in Burma And Bangladesh Are Feeling Pressure to Settle a Long -running Dispute over Maritime Boundaries in the Bay of Bengal vol. 18, no. 7 (July 2010 ), The IRRAWADDY Website, http ://www2. irrawaddy, org/print_article, php? art_id : 18917.
  • 4Myo Thant, Burma, Bangladesh Maritime Dispute Ends, MIZZIMA Website, March 15,2012, http ://www. mizzima, com/news/region- al/6768 - burma - bangladesh - maritime - dispute - ends. html.
  • 5Paul Ruma, Bangladesh Firm on Gas Search, Wants Borders Clarity, REUTERS Website, October 8,2009, http ://in. reuters, corn/arti- cle/2009/ 10/08/idlNIndia - 43008120091008.
  • 6申恩真:“大宇国际缅甸开发油田2013年可商业开采”,载《朝鲜日报中文网》2011年10月4日,http://chn.chosun.com/big5/site/data/htmldit/2011/10/04/20111004000006.html.
  • 7Jared Bissinger, supra note 2.
  • 8International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea ( ITLOS), 2012 ITLOS Judgment : Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh v. Myanraar) , Judgment of 14 March 2012, at para. 46 [ Hereinaf-ter Bay of Bengal Case ].
  • 9孟加拉国已于2001年7月27日批准《1982年联合国海洋法公约》,并于2001年8月26日生效.
  • 10缅甸于1996年5月21批准《1982年联合国海洋法公约》,并于1996年6月20日生效.

共引文献11

同被引文献22

引证文献4

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部