期刊文献+

中美贸易冲突中欧盟的政策选择——基于贸易自由主义与重商主义的分析 被引量:4

EU's Policy Options in the Sino-US Trade Conflicts——An Analysis Based on Trade Liberalism and Mercantilism
原文传递
导出
摘要 中美贸易冲突是贯穿2018年的国际热点议题之一。虽然冲突有缓和之势,但由于中美之争已超越经济利益范畴,美国对华采取的重商主义贸易政策料将成为未来"主旋律"。在这一背景下,作为中美共同的第一贸易伙伴——欧盟的政策选择变得至关重要。虽然欧盟对华贸易也存在较大逆差,并且贸易保护主义在欧盟内逐渐升温,但其贸易政策的核心仍然是自由主义,因此不会偏向美国一方。与此同时,由于欧盟对美国贸易存在顺差,其偏向中国一方的可能性也不大。未来欧盟贸易政策将更多的表现出中立的状态。 The Sino-US trade conflicts are one of the international hot topics that have run through 2018.Although the conflicts exhibit a trend of abatement,the Sino-US disputes have exceeded the field of economic interests;the US mercantilist trade policy towards China is expected to become the“main theme”in the future.In this context,the policy choices of the EU as the first trading partner of both China and the United States have become crucial.Although the EU's trade with China is running huge deficits as well,and trade protectionism is gradually heating up within the EU,the core of its trade policy is still based on liberalism,so it will not be biased towards the US side.At the same time,due to the EU's trade surplus with the United States,it is also unlikely that it will be biased towards the Chinese side.In the future,EU trade policy will show a more neutral status.
作者 季哲忱 Ji Zhechen
出处 《国际关系研究》 CSSCI 2019年第1期77-96,156-157,共21页 Journal of International Relations
关键词 中美贸易争端 欧盟贸易政策 重商主义 自由主义 Sino-US trade disputes EU's trade policy mercantilism liberalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献148

  • 1门洪华.国际机制与美国霸权[J].美国研究,2001,15(1):74-88. 被引量:57
  • 2[美]安-玛丽·伯利:《对世界的管制:多边主义、国际法与新政管制》,[美]约翰·罗杰编,苏长和等译:《多边主义》,杭州:浙江人民出版社,2001年版,第149~169页.
  • 3苏长和:《区域主义与全球治理》,俞正揉、陈玉刚、苏长和 著:《全球政治范式研究》,中国台湾:雁山出版社,2003年版,第76页.
  • 4Anne—Marie Slaughter",“Law among Liberal States:Liberal Internationalism and the Act of State Doctrine,”Columbia LawReview,V01.92,No.8,December 1992,PP.1907—1996.
  • 5Anne -Marie Slaughter, "Intemational Law and International Relations Theory: A NewGeneration of Interdisciplinary Scholarship," American Journal of InternationalLaw, Vol. 92, No. 3, July 1998, pp. 367 - 397.
  • 6Anne - Marie Slaughter, "International Law in a World of Liberal States, "pp.503- 538.
  • 7Anne- Marie Slaughter,"International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda,"pp.205- 2390.
  • 8Anne- Marie Slaughter, "Law among Liberal States: Liberal Internationalism and the Act of State Doctrine, "pp. 1917- 19200.
  • 9Mark W. Zacher and Richard A. Mathew, "Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands, "pp. 132- 133.
  • 10Charles Beitz, "Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism," lntemational Affairs, Vol.75, No.3,July 1999,pp.516 - 517.

共引文献150

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部