犯罪对象相关概念检讨

The Review of Relevant Concepts of Criminous Targets

作为通说的犯罪构成四要件理论,通常将犯罪对象安置于犯罪客体此一要件中并予探讨。此种安置的深层义理何在?犯罪客体若为充要条件,则犯罪对象是否为每一犯罪之必备要件?犯罪对象是否必须具备'合法性'?直观地,(危害)行为——(侵犯)对象——(危害)结果三者之间逻辑进路清晰,但为何犯罪对象与危害结果在四要件构成体系中被'跨要件'分置而非一统?本文从司法实践'犯罪认知'的角度尝试对如上问题做初步回答。

As the requirement that the four elements that constitute a crime in theory,would normally criminal targets placed in such an object of the crime and the elements to explore.What is meaning of such arrangements?If the object of the crime must be sufficient and is the necessary condition,whether it committed as each erime’s essential element?Is the crime must have"legitimacy"?Intuitively,(Hazard)behavior-(Violations)target-(Hazard)results are the three logical approach roads,but why crime against targets and the results of the four elements which constitute a system was"inter-element"at home rather than unifying?This paper discuss the judicial practice"criminal understandings"on the point of trying to do as initial answer to the problem.