我国当前行政诉讼原告资格的不足及完善

The Defects and Improvement of Our Country’s Current Administration Litigation Plaintiff Qualification

在行政诉讼理论及实务中,原告资格是一颇受关注的问题。而纵观我国有关原告资格的理论研究和立法、司法实践,可以发现在该问题上尚存在诸如原告资格理论不成熟,且不独立、标准不明确、范围不宽松、类别不全面及法院在该问题上未发挥应有功能等不足。针对这些不足,需要从观念上对原告资格的价值和功能进行重新定位,在立法中就行政私益诉讼和行政公益诉讼分别设定原告资格,在司法实践中确保法院在该问题上充分发挥能动性。

Plaintiff qualification is a problem discussed broadly in administrative litigation theory and practice.But with a general observation of our country’s theory research,legislation and judicial practice about plaintiff qualification,we can find that it has the following defects,such as plaintiff qualification theory is immature and not independent,the standard is ambiguous,the range is limited,the category is not completed and the court haven’t played it’s role as-wanted.In view of these defects,needs to relocate the idea on the value and function of plaintiff qualification,establish different plaintiff qualifications in the legislation according to the administrative individual litigation and public litigation,and guarantee the court the full activity in the judicial practice.