实证视野下不批准逮捕案件法律说理制度之探讨——以成都市检察机关为视点

The reasoning analysis system of not to approve the arrest case at the empirical perspective—-in the Prosecution of Chengdu’s view

对不批准逮捕案件实行法律说理在检察机关推行之初是为了消弭检察机关行使不批准逮捕决定权与公安机关行使侦查权之间的疑问、矛盾与冲突,消解案件当事人(尤其是被害人)的疑问,尽力减少不和谐因素的重要举措,其在司法实践中取得了解决异议争端、节约诉讼资源、降低诉讼成本、提升案件质量、减少涉诉信访等诸多明显效果。不批准逮捕案件法律说理作为检察机关探索的新型法律诠释制度隐含了一种制度性的变革进路,改变了基于目前状况下检察机关行使检察权执法办案过程中不说理或者说理不充分,并且在短时间内不能改善的弊端,既能维护检察权的权威,又能提升检察机关的执法公信力。

At the beginning,in order to eliminate doubtor conflicts between the Prosecution to exercise the decision rights of not to approve the arrest and the Police to exercise the investigation rights,removing the litigants’doubt,especially the victim’s,striving to reduce the discord elements,the reasoning analysis system of not to approve the arrest case is carried out,which bring about many effects in judicial practition,such as resolving the objection,saving the litigation resource,reducing the litigation cost,improving the quality of case,cutting down the petition and so on.As a new type of judicial interpretation system by the Prosecution,the reasoning analysis system of not to approve the arrest case implicates the institutional transform,having changed the abuse situation which cannot be improved in short time,which is the Prosecution not to reason or reasoning is not enough during handling case by exercising their rights.Thus,it can maintain the authority of the Prosecution’s prosecutorial power,which also can improve the credibility of the Prosecution.