期刊文献+

治愈机会丧失侵权案件救济路径研究

Research on Remedy Path of Tort Cases of Loss of Cure Opportunity
原文传递
导出
摘要 医患双方是构筑良好医疗环境的责任共同体,当传统理论面对医疗侵权领域新出现的治愈机会丧失侵权案件陷入解决困境时,就需要对传统理论做出适当突破和调整,以弥补传统侵权理论的不足,从而实现对治愈机会丧失侵权案件中受害患者的正义救济。我国对于治愈机会丧失侵权案件尚未形成统一的裁判标准,结合借鉴域外既有的相关理论与判例解决模式,当依照证据优势规则可以确定诊疗过失与患者损害之间的因果关系时,则依照传统侵权理论实现对患者的救济;当诊疗过失与患者损害之间的因果关系达不到相当性的证明程度时,则应依其因果关系的契合程度按比例规定侵权责任。 Both doctors and patients are responsible communities for building a good medical environment.When the traditional theory falls into a difficult position in the face of the newly emerged cases of medical tort,it is necessary to make appropriate breakthroughs and adjustments to the traditional theory in order to make up for the shortcomings of the traditional tort theory and thus realize the just relief for the victims in the cases of loss of cure opportunity.Our country has not yet formed a unified judgment standard for cases of infringement of cure opportunity loss,and when the causal relationship between diagnosis and treatment negligence and patient damage can be determined according to the rules of evidence superiority,the relief for patients will be realized according to the traditional infringement theory.When the causal relationship between the diagnosis and treatment negligence and the patient’s injury does not reach the level of proof of equivalence,the tort liability shall be determined according to the degree of coincidence of the causal relationship.
作者 钱宁 张善斌(指导) Qian Ning
出处 《光华法学》 2019年第1期136-146,共11页 Guanghua Law Review
关键词 治愈机会丧失 医疗侵权 诊疗过失 比例责任 loss of cure opportunity medical tort medical negligence proportional liability
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献33

  • 1覃有土,晏宇桥.论侵权的间接损失认定[J].现代法学,2004,26(4):28-33. 被引量:25
  • 2夏芸.医疗事故赔偿法[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:539.
  • 3.《最高人民法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第19条,第25条的规定[Z].,..
  • 4See (1990) 169 CLR 638.
  • 5See 668 N. E. 2d. at 485.
  • 6See 662 So. 2d 131(La. Ct. App. 1995).
  • 7See Howe v. Teefy(1927)27 S. R. (N, S. W. ).
  • 8See Wynn v. NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation (1995) 184 CLR.
  • 9See Sellars v. Adelaide Petroleum (1994) 179 CLR 332.
  • 10See Murphy v Miller, (16 October 1998, u/r).

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部