期刊文献+

基于期望与K次方差的信息检索质量评估模型的研究 被引量:2

A NEW MEASURE FOR EVALUATION OF INFORMATION RETRIEVAL QUALITY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 查全率和查准率是评估信息检索系统检索质量的两个基本标准 .长期以来 ,基于这两个标准 ,存在着多种评价方法 .但是 ,这些方法基本上是对查全率和查准率做简单的处理 ,仅反映检索的平均性能 ,而对检索稳定性没有分析 ,并且缺乏一套科学的、系统的评估体系 .针对这种情况 ,借鉴概率学中的期望和方差的思想 ,用数学语言严格定义了查全期望、查准期望 ,K次查全方差和 K次查准方差等概念 .在这些概念的基础上 ,给出了信息检索质量评估准则 .与其它模型相比 ,该模型能从检索的平均质量和检索的稳定性两方面反映检索系统的性能 ,因此 。 Recall and precision are the basic criteria for evaluation of retrieval quality in information retrieval systems. Much effort and research has been done to solve the problem of the evaluation. Many methods have been proposed for evaluation of retrieval quality. However, they only reflect the average performance of retrieval but lack the analysis of stability of retrieval. In this paper, a new measure for evaluation of information retrieval quality is brought forward. The measure is based on some concepts that are called recall expectation, recall K variance, precision expectation, and precision K variance. Compared with other evaluation models of retrieval quality, this measure can reflect both the average performance and the stabilization of retrieval. Therefore, this model is better for evaluating the retrieval quality of information retrieval systems.
出处 《计算机研究与发展》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2002年第12期1764-1770,共7页 Journal of Computer Research and Development
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划基金资助 (G19990 3 2 70 5 )
关键词 期望 K次方差 信息检索 质量评估模型 查准期望 检索质量 recall expectation, recall K variance, precision expectation, precision K variance, retrieval quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1丘维生.高等代数(上册)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1996..

同被引文献20

  • 1彭波,闫宏飞.搜索引擎检索系统质量评估[J].计算机研究与发展,2005,42(10):1706-1711. 被引量:10
  • 2Leazer, G. H, and others. Evaluating the Use of a Geographic Digital Library in Undergraduate Clsssrooms:ADEPT.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no[S]. IIS - 9817432,2001,2005 - 05 - 20.
  • 3Rapp. D. N,and others.The impact of digital libraries on cognitive processes: psychological isaues of hypermedia[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2003,19(5) :609 - 628.
  • 4Ling F,and others. Beyond information searching and browsing:acquiring knowledge from digital libraries [ J ]. Information Processing and Management,2005,41(1) :97-120.
  • 5E. Bonabeau, M. Dorigo, and G. Theraulaz. Swarm Intelligence:From Natural to Artificial Systems[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1999.12 - 38.
  • 6Plains, W. Alternatives in Science [ J ]. International Journal of Sociology, 1978, (8) : 1 - 2.
  • 7Saracevic, T. Digital Library Evaluation: Toward an Evolution of Concepts[J]. Library Trends,2000,49(2):350 - 369.
  • 8周萌清.信息理论基础[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2002.7—38.
  • 9Mceliece,R.J.The Theory of Information and Coding[M]. Addison:Wesley Publishing Company, 1992.46.
  • 10Kahneman, D, Slovic, P, and Tversky, A, editors. Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.32 - 39.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部