期刊文献+

养老社会保险管理成本问题研究——以英国为例 被引量:3

Study on Administrative Cost of Old -Age Social Insurance——A Case Analysis of U.K.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在讨论养老社会保险制度的改革方向问题时,尽管直接比较不同养老计划的管理成本十分困难,但管理成本仍然是一个重要的考虑因素。依据利率期限结构原理,通过分析个人账户的成本到期结构,可以对个人账户的管理成本进行具体计算。以英国的数据为例,将管理成本进一步分解为积累率、转换率、年金率,最终计算出英国个人账户的管理费用率为0.44,这一结果大大超出人们通常的估计水平。本文为设计一个低成本的个人账户管理制度提供了可借鉴的思路,并主张中国“统账结合”的养老社会保险制度中的个人账户应实行个人所有、适度集中的市场化经营管理模式。 Although it is very difficult to comp are the administrative costs of diff erent pension schemes,the admin-istrative costs play a prominent role in the current debate over old -age s ocial insurance reform across the globe.This paper presents a framework for e valuating administrative costs of i ndividual accounts based on the term structure of interest rates by analyzing the ma turity structure of administrative costs.Drawing on data from U.K.the p aper decomposed the charge ratio into acc umulation ratio,alteration ratio,annuity ratio and calculation indic ates that the charge ratio of individual accounts in U.K.is 0.44,which means many prev ious estimates of costs for U.K.have estimated lower charges.The study h elps people to know how to design indi vidual accounts with low costs.Our p olicy recommendations for China' s individual accounts emphasize that privately owned,moderately centr alized and market -oriented management model is the appropriate Choice.
作者 刘子兰 李珍
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第11期34-39,14,共7页 China Soft Science
基金 本研究为国家自然科学基金项目(79970106)阶段性成果。
关键词 英国 管理成本 养老社会保险 利率期限结构 管理费用率 费用到期结构 administrative cost old -age socia l insurance term structure of interest rates charge ratio the maturit y structure of charges
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Henry J. Aaron, Alan S. Blinder, Alicia H. Munnell, and Peter R. Orszag. Perspectives on the Draft Interim Report of the President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security:2001.7.
  • 2Olivia Mitchell," Administrative Costs in Public and Private Retirement Systems," in M. Feldstein, ed., Privatizing Social Security (National Bureau of Economic Research: Chicago, 1998).
  • 3Olivia Mitchell," Administrative Costs in Public and Private Retirement Systems," in M. Feldstein, ed., Privatizing Social Security (National Bureau of Economic Research: Chicago, 1998), P404.
  • 4韩大伟等 .养老金体制 [M].北京 : 经济科学出版社 ,2000.45.
  • 5Mamta Murthi, J. Michael Orszag and Peter R. Orszag, " Administrative Costs under a Decentralized Approach to Individual Accounts: Lessons from the United Kingdom. Presented at the conference on " New Ideas About Old Age Security". The World Bank, September 1999.
  • 6National Academy of Social Insurance, " Evaluating Issues in Privatizing Social Security, Report of the Panel on Privatization of Social secwrity", Washingtton 1998.
  • 7Amy Finkelstein and James Poterba," Selection Effects in the Market for Individual Annuities: Evidence from the United Kingdom", NBER Working Paper 7168, 1999.

同被引文献21

  • 1褚福灵.养老保险金替代率研究[J].北京市计划劳动管理干部学院学报,2004,12(3):17-21. 被引量:44
  • 2李珍.个账基金运营所面临的挑战和机遇[J].中国社会保障,2006(12):22-24. 被引量:5
  • 3ICI(2004), "Mutual funds and the U.S. retirement market in 2003", Fundamentals 13(2).
  • 4Social Security Administration(1995), Fast & Facts Figures About Social Security, 7.
  • 5M.N.Carter & W.G. Shitmmn(1996), Promises To Keep: Saving Social Security's Dream, Washington, D.C. : Regnery Publishing, Inc.
  • 6R. Disney(1999), "OECD public pension programs in crisis: An evaluation of the reform options", paper presented at ACES at the ASSA meetings in New York.
  • 7H. J. Aaron, A. S. Blinder, A. H. Munnell & P. R.Orszag (2001), Response to the Co - chairs of the Commission, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the Century Foundation, July 24.
  • 8H. J. Aaron, A. S. Blinder, A. H. Munneil & P. R. Orszag( 2001), "Perspectives on the draft interim report of the President' s Commission to strengthen social security", Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the Century Foundation, July 23.
  • 9The Century Foundation ( 2001 ), "Social security privatization : Eleven myths", Issue Brief # 10 Df the Social Security Network,July, 17.
  • 10A.H.Munnell(1998), "Privatization plans hit women hardest",The Social Security Network, 11/12.

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部