期刊文献+

最惠国条款在BIT争端解决中的适用问题 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 最惠国待遇不是一条习惯国际法规则,其适用依赖于缔约各方的合意。在BIT规定MFN待遇的适用范围与例外不够明确时,ICSID仲裁庭对于MFN条款是否能够适用于争端解决程序尚未取得一致意见,存在着有限适用、完全适用、基本不适用、完全不适用四种情况。中国目前的BIT实践不能排除将来仲裁庭把最惠国条款适用于争端解决的可能性,应就此采取相应对策。 To grant MFN treatment is not an obligation of customary international law and its applicability is to be determined by the agreement between the parties.While the scope and exemptions of the MFN clause are not defined clearly enough in BIT,the ICSID tribunals held four different opinions in determine whether the MFN treatment is applicable to dispute settlement proceeding,namely"applicable restrictively","applicable completely","basically inapplicable",and"completely inapplicable".China’s modern BIT practice makes it possible that the future ICSID tribunal may hold the opinion that the MFN treatment stipulated in BIT between China and a foreign country is applicable to dispute settlement proceeding,thus corresponding countermeasure should be adopted.
作者 王海浪 Wang Hailang
出处 《国际经济法学刊》 2007年第2期155-179,共25页 Journal of International Economic Law
  • 相关文献

同被引文献18

  • 1车丕照.从国际法角度看我国物权法草案中的征收补偿标准[J].时代法学,2007,5(1):3-8. 被引量:3
  • 2徐崇利.从实体到程序:最惠国待遇适用范围之争[J].法商研究,2007,24(2):41-50. 被引量:38
  • 3UNCTAD.Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II . 2010
  • 4RosInvest Co UK Ltd.v.The Russian Federation. SCC Case No.Arb.V079/2005 .
  • 5S.Fietta.Most Favoured Nation Treat ment and Dispute Resolution under Bilateral Invest ment Treaties:A Turing Point?[].Inter-national Arbitration Law Review.2005
  • 6Dana H Freyer,David Herlihy.Most-Favored-Nation Treatment and Dispute Settlement in Investment Arbitration: Just How "Favored" is "Most-Favored"?[].ICSID review.2005
  • 7Stephan W. Schill.Principles of International Investment Law[].European Journal of International Law.2009
  • 8Yannick Radi.The Application of the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause to the Dispute Settlement Provisions of Bilateral Investment Treaties: Domesticating the ‘Trojan Horse&rsquo[].European Journal of International Law.2007
  • 9Alexander Orakhelashvili.III. Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo ( Democratic Republic of the Congo v Rwanda ), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment of 3 February 2006[].International & Comparative Law Quarterly.2006
  • 10Julie A Maupin.MFN-based Jurisdiction in Investor-State Arbitration: Is There Any Hope for a Consistent Approach?[].Journal of International Economic Law.2011

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部