期刊文献+

美国的单边主义行动违反国际法 被引量:3

The Unilateral Action of the Trump Administration Is Inconsistent with International Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 特朗普政府依据其国内法一再对世界多国的钢铝产品加征关税,又依据'301条款'对中国产品加征关税。美国的单边行动不仅违反了GATT第1条最惠国待遇原则、第2条关税减让义务,也违反了国际法'条约必须遵守'和'禁止反言'原则。中国等WTO成员的反制措施符合GATT第21条'安全例外'规定,也是国际法允许的反制行为。 The Trump Administration imposed 25 percent and 10 percent of additional import duty respectively on certain steel products and aluminum products from many countries according to its domestic law and it also imposed an additional 25 percent ad valorem duty based on its Section 301 investigation against China.The unilateral action of the United States not only violated the MFN principle of Article 1 of GATT 1994 and the tariff binding obligation under Article 2 of GATT 1994,but also violated the principles of Pacta Sunt Servanda and Estoppel.The counter-measures taken by WTO Members,including China,are in conformity with Article 21 of GATT 1994 and are counter-measures permitted by international law.
作者 朱榄叶 Zhu Lanye
出处 《国际经济法学刊》 CSSCI 2018年第4期1-11,共11页 Journal of International Economic Law
关键词 “301条款” WTO法律 GATT第21条安全例外 国际法上的反制 'Section 301' WTO Law Security Exceptions under Article 21 of GATT Countermeasures under International Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Rubin,The International Effects of Unilateral Declarations, 71 AM. J, INTL L .at 30 (1977).
  • 2Nuclear Tests (Australia. V. France) 1974 I.C.J. (DEC. 20).
  • 3Bowett, Estoppel Before International Tribunals and Its Relations to Acquiescence, 33 BRITYYINT'L. 176, 176(1957).
  • 4Payment of Various Serbian Loans Issued in France (Serbia v. France), 1929 P.I.C..1. (ser. A) Nos. 20/21, at 38001y 12).
  • 5Eastern Grennland,1933 P 1 CJ set A/B, No. 53.
  • 6United Kingdom v Norway., 1951 I.CJ 116(Dec. 18).
  • 7Megan L Wagner, Jurisdiction by Estoopel in the International Court of Justice, 74 Calif. L gev 1777; MacGibbon, Estoppel in International Law, 7 INT'L AND COMPL,Q,4681 477 (1958).
  • 8Nottebolm (Liechtenstein v Guatemala), 1951 I.C.J 166(Dec. 18).
  • 9Barcelona Traction, Light & Power Co (Belgium v. Spain), 1964 I.C.J 6(July 24).
  • 10MacGibbon,Est oppelin lntemationalLaw,7INT ' LANDCOMPL.Q.468,477(1958).

共引文献3

同被引文献21

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部