重裁事由的问题与主义——基于域外经验与本土实践的考察

Grounds for Remission of Arbitral Awards:Diverse Approaches and Chinese Practice

重裁事由是重新仲裁制度的核心问题,辨清重新仲裁的本质、理清重裁与撤裁的程序逻辑、勘定其与相关制度的功能界限均是科学规划具体事由的必要前提。只有认同重裁是既判力原则例外的本质,才能避免重裁事由的恣意扩张;只有考察不同重裁程序的特征,才能确保重裁事由的程序逻辑;只有注意重裁与相关制度的分工合作,才能避免事由的混淆与冲突。上述理念的缺乏和实践中法外程序的盛行阻碍了我国重裁事由的精细化发展。

The issue of grounds for remission is the primacy of remission system.Discerning the very nature of remission,searching for the link between remission proceedings and setting aside proceedings,distinguishing the functions of remission from those of other remedies are the necessary prerequisites of determining grounds for remission.Only by recognizing that remission is an exception to the principle of Res Judicata can grounds for remission be limited.Only by reviewing the diverse remission proceedings can grounds for remission be suitable to them.Only by differentiating the functions of remission from those of other recourses can an amalgamation of grounds for remission and grounds for other relevant measures be avoided.The absence of conceptions mentioned above and special procedure in China impede the development of grounds for remission in a detailed way.